H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Meghann Shaughnessy vs Nuria Llagostera Vives H2H: 4-0

Meghann Shaughnessy holds a 4–0 lead over Nuria Llagostera Vives in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Meghann Shaughnessy leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Meghann Shaughnessy won the 2007 Barcelona third round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Meghann Shaughnessy
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Nuria Llagostera Vives
ESP Age 46 Right-Handed 156 cm / 5'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 14, 2007* Barcelona WTA 250 R32 Clay Meghann Shaughnessy #49 6-3 6-4 Nuria Llagostera Vives #191 Match data
Jun 25, 2004* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Meghann Shaughnessy #35 6-4 4-6 10-8 Nuria Llagostera Vives #142 Match data
Jan 15, 2003* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Meghann Shaughnessy #33 4-6 6-3 6-3 Nuria Llagostera Vives #205 Match data
Jan 2, 2002* Gold Coast WTA 250 R32 Hard Meghann Shaughnessy #12 6-2 6-2 Nuria Llagostera Vives #103 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,888 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Nuria Llagostera Vives #775 #35 968 1,685 77 110 41.2% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Nuria Llagostera Vives
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,439 0 0 2000 4–6 40.0% #128 1,510 0 0
21 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,652 0 1 2001 8–12 40.0% #103 1,499 0 0
22 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,825 0 2 2002 1–8 11.1% #192 1,441 0 0
23 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,716 0 2 2003 1–2 33.3% #140 1,448 0 0
24 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,725 0 3 2004 4–6 40.0% #76 1,485 0 0
25 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,663 0 3 2005 20–19 51.3% #50 1,620 0 1
26 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,563 0 3 2006 6–5 54.5% #275 1,626 0 1
27 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5 2007 5–10 33.3% #145 1,557 0 1
28 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6 2008 13–10 56.5% #68 1,620 0 2
29 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6 2009 8–16 33.3% #146 1,559 0 2
30 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6 2010 4–7 36.4% #127 1,564 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2011 3–9 25.0% #131 1,548 0 2