H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Meghann Shaughnessy vs Rachel Mcquillan H2H: 1-1

Meghann Shaughnessy and Rachel Mcquillan are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Meghann Shaughnessy leads 1–0 on clay, while Rachel Mcquillan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Meghann Shaughnessy won the 2001 Strasbourg Open round of 32 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Meghann Shaughnessy
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Rachel Mcquillan
AUS Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Meghann Shaughnessy #19 6-2 6-2 Rachel Mcquillan #68 Match data May 24, 2001* R32 Strasbourg Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Rachel Mcquillan #71 6-3 6-4 Meghann Shaughnessy #24 Match data Mar 8, 2001 R32 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,903 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Rachel Mcquillan #971 #28 582 1,826 163 197 45.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Rachel Mcquillan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1988 3–4 42.9% #159 1,525 0 0
17 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,511 0 0 1989 13–15 46.4% #79 1,628 0 0
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0 1990 27–21 56.2% #39 1,710 0 0
19 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0 1991 26–20 56.5% #36 1,744 0 0
20 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,438 0 0 1992 18–14 56.2% #38 1,742 0 0
21 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,651 0 1 1993 13–23 36.1% #115 1,571 0 0
22 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,832 0 2 1994 20–17 54.1% #61 1,649 0 0
23 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,738 0 2 1995 13–16 44.8% #69 1,667 0 0
24 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,729 0 3 1996 2–10 16.7% #186 1,563 0 0
25 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,662 0 3 1997 10–10 50.0% #48 1,645 0 0
26 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,566 0 3 1998 3–15 16.7% #185 1,528 0 0
27 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5 1999 1–3 25.0% #160 1,520 0 0
28 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6 2000 0–4 0.0% #107 1,463 0 0
29 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6 2001 12–17 41.4% #79 1,524 0 0
30 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6 2002 2–7 22.2% #178 1,473 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #355 1,464 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Rachel Mcquillan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
17 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 3 8 11 27.3% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
18 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 10 5 15 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
19 1998 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 9 6 15 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 5 11 16 31.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 9 5 14 64.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 2000 15 10 25 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 9 14 23 39.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2001 18 14 32 56.3% 15 7 22 68.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 1994 17 13 30 56.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 2002 16 15 31 51.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1995 11 10 21 52.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 2003 26 13 39 66.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1996 2 7 9 22.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2004 14 16 30 46.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1997 9 5 14 64.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2005 9 15 24 37.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1998 1 9 10 10.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2006 14 13 27 51.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1999 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 7 13 20 35.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 9 10 19 47.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2009 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 126 133 259 48.6% 74 67 141 52.5% 20 19 39 51.3% 13 14 27 48.1% — 94 108 202 46.5% 41 46 87 47.1% 12 25 37 32.4% 16 18 34 47.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Rachel Mcquillan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1525 105.3 — — — — +33 — +35 40.0% -1.00 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.46
17 1996 1512 107.9 — — — — +9 +65 — 47.1% 0.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.72 1989 1628 133.6 — — — — -84 +68 — 52.3% +0.29 3–8 (27%) 5–7 (42%) 96.2 -0.04
18 1997 1499 96.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.03 1990 1710 138.1 — — — — -54 +68 -125 55.5% +0.15 7–7 (50%) 11–3 (79%) 108.8 -1.35
19 1998 1544 115.4 — — — — -48 +81 — 46.2% -0.03 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +0.65 1991 1745 143.2 — — — — -36 +98 -162 56.1% +0.50 7–8 (47%) 10–7 (59%) 102.3 -1.03
20 1999 1439 99.7 — — — — +16 +55 +130 36.5% -0.77 3–7 (30%) 3–5 (38%) 93.7 +2.27 1992 1743 134.0 — — — — +48 +31 — 57.7% +0.24 4–5 (44%) 5–2 (71%) 101.4 +0.56
21 2000 1652 133.2 — — — — -10 -80 -108 54.2% +0.11 4–6 (40%) 7–6 (54%) 102.1 +0.56 1993 1571 123.4 — — — — +47 +137 +1 43.7% -0.23 3–12 (20%) 0–5 (0%) — 0.00
22 2001 1832 151.0 — — — — -45 -52 -141 59.9% +0.71 15–6 (71%) 15–11 (58%) 110.5 +1.29 1994 1650 132.0 — — — — +20 — -38 51.7% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.6 -0.52
23 2002 1738 139.5 — — — — +19 -30 -36 51.6% +0.17 9–9 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 94.1 +0.83 1995 1668 136.0 — — — — +64 -22 -89 46.9% -0.33 2–6 (25%) 4–0 (100%) 99.7 -0.84
24 2003 1730 144.7 +2.14 -0.89 0.995 50.1% +45 -9 — 57.6% +0.54 9–8 (53%) 7–10 (41%) 96.1 +1.17 1996 1564 118.6 — — — — +94 — — 25.9% -1.26 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 96.5 -0.32
25 2004 1662 135.5 +1.00 -1.59 0.925 48.6% +19 +57 -22 50.0% +0.18 5–7 (42%) 5–8 (38%) 96.1 +1.24 1997 1646 124.9 — — — — +88 -103 -51 46.8% -0.11 5–2 (71%) 0–6 (0%) 99.4 +0.04
26 2005 1566 122.3 +4.57 -2.35 1.103 51.7% +20 +69 +81 44.8% -0.34 4–9 (31%) 7–6 (54%) 94.8 +0.33 1998 1528 122.7 — — — — +87 -7 — 29.5% -0.93 1–7 (13%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.66
27 2006 1709 130.5 +1.38 -2.93 0.947 48.9% -49 +14 — 55.0% +0.25 9–6 (60%) 4–1 (80%) 107.6 -1.20 1999 1521 111.6 — — — — +78 — — 30.0% -1.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.09
28 2007 1666 128.5 +1.99 -3.46 0.952 49.3% -76 +156 -17 47.7% -0.09 4–6 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 96.4 +0.26 2000 1464 94.4 — — — — +80 — — 27.3% -1.09 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.36
29 2008 1580 93.2 -2.35 -2.24 0.773 45.3% — +131 — 14.3% -2.86 0–1 — — -0.09 2001 1524 120.3 — — — — +71 -27 -53 43.5% -0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.9 +1.07
30 2009 1534 114.6 -0.18 -4.49 0.730 44.3% -22 — — 23.8% -2.14 0–3 (0%) — — -0.71 2002 1474 99.4 — — — — +43 — — 25.0% -1.40 1–1 1–0 — +0.25
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1464 100.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.03
Career — 1904 137.9 +1.67 -2.91 0.933 48.8% -6 +25 -17 50.9% +0.08 66–73 (47%) 56–61 (48%) 95.9 +1.59 — 1826 136.8 — — — — +27 +53 -57 47.7% -0.13 47–72 (39%) 45–44 (51%) 97.6 -0.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.