H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Meghann Shaughnessy vs Rita Grande H2H: 4-1

Meghann Shaughnessy holds a 4–1 lead over Rita Grande in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Meghann Shaughnessy leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Meghann Shaughnessy won the 2002 Eastbourne fourth round 6-4 6-2.

USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
ITA Age 51 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 21, 2002* Eastbourne WTA 500 R16 Grass Meghann Shaughnessy #15 6-4 6-2 Rita Grande #38 Match data
Aug 29, 2001* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Meghann Shaughnessy #12 3-6 6-3 7-6(2) Rita Grande #42 Match data
May 16, 2001* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Meghann Shaughnessy #20 6-2 1-6 6-1 Rita Grande #52 Match data
Feb 10, 2000* Bogota WTA 250 R32 Clay Meghann Shaughnessy #87 6-2 7-5 Rita Grande #73 Match data
Jan 21, 1998* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Rita Grande #46 6-4 6-3 Meghann Shaughnessy #197 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,888 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Rita Grande #1,172 #24 1,020 1,755 172 218 44.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Rita Grande
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1991 0–2 0.0% #370 1,471 0 0
17 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,512 0 0
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #186 1,456 0 0
19 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0 1994 7–12 36.8% #146 1,491 0 0
20 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,439 0 0 1995 10–11 47.6% #72 1,591 0 0
21 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,652 0 1 1996 10–15 40.0% #71 1,627 0 0
22 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,825 0 2 1997 15–18 45.5% #44 1,676 0 0
23 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,716 0 2 1998 12–23 34.3% #59 1,584 0 0
24 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,725 0 3 1999 21–18 53.8% #54 1,679 0 0
25 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,663 0 3 2000 15–21 41.7% #77 1,602 0 0
26 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,563 0 3 2001 35–26 57.4% #24 1,742 0 2
27 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5 2002 21–27 43.8% #46 1,641 0 2
28 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6 2003 14–25 35.9% #70 1,534 0 3
29 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6 2004 12–18 40.0% #104 1,536 0 3
30 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6 2005 0–1 0.0% #1088 1,518 0 3