H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Meghann Shaughnessy vs Tatiana Panova H2H: 2-1

Meghann Shaughnessy holds a 2–1 lead over Tatiana Panova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Meghann Shaughnessy leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Tatiana Panova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Meghann Shaughnessy won the 2005 Seoul third round 6-1 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Meghann Shaughnessy
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Tatiana Panova
RUS Age 49 Right-Handed 154 cm / 5'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 29, 2005* Seoul WTA 250 R32 Hard Meghann Shaughnessy #53 6-1 7-6(4) Tatiana Panova #106 Match data
Apr 6, 2002* Sarasota WTA 250 SF Clay Tatiana Panova #25 7-6(9) 6-4 Meghann Shaughnessy #13 Match data
Aug 6, 1998* Istanbul WTA 250 R32 Hard Meghann Shaughnessy #90 6-3 6-4 Tatiana Panova #67 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,888 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Tatiana Panova #1,113 #20 1,270 1,782 130 196 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Tatiana Panova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,512 0 0 1994 1–2 33.3% #142 1,508 0 0
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0 1995 1–6 14.3% #179 1,486 0 0
19 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0 1996 2–2 50.0% #159 1,498 0 0
20 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,439 0 0 1997 3–10 23.1% #97 1,475 0 0
21 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,652 0 1 1998 7–18 28.0% #78 1,472 0 0
22 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,825 0 2 1999 14–23 37.8% #40 1,584 0 0
23 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,716 0 2 2000 23–28 45.1% #34 1,698 0 0
24 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,725 0 3 2001 22–30 42.3% #40 1,664 0 0
25 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,663 0 3 2002 34–31 52.3% #23 1,752 0 0
26 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,563 0 3 2003 7–13 35.0% #114 1,636 0 0
27 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5 2004 8–14 36.4% #77 1,595 0 0
28 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6 2005 8–15 34.8% #91 1,519 0 0
29 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6 2006 0–4 0.0% #376 1,470 0 0
30 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6 — — — — — — —