H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Meghann Shaughnessy vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 4-0

Meghann Shaughnessy holds a 4–0 lead over Virginia Ruano Pascual in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Meghann Shaughnessy leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Meghann Shaughnessy won the 2006 Los Angeles fourth round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Meghann Shaughnessy
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Virginia Ruano Pascual
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 11, 2006* Los Angeles WTA 500 R16 Hard Meghann Shaughnessy #77 6-3 6-3 Virginia Ruano Pascual #73 Match data
Apr 17, 2003* Amelia Island WTA 500 R32 Clay Meghann Shaughnessy #19 6-2 6-3 Virginia Ruano Pascual #41 Match data
Jun 23, 1999* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Meghann Shaughnessy #88 6-3 3-6 6-3 Virginia Ruano Pascual #46 Match data
Jul 10, 1998* Prague WTA 250 R16 Clay Meghann Shaughnessy #109 4-6 6-3 7-5 Virginia Ruano Pascual #40 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,888 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,819 199 235 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Meghann Shaughnessy Virginia Ruano Pascual
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0
17 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,512 0 0 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,494 0 0
19 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0
20 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,439 0 0 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,477 0 0
21 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,652 0 1 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0
22 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,825 0 2 1996 8–15 34.8% #87 1,570 0 0
23 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,716 0 2 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,730 0 1
24 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,725 0 3 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,774 0 2
25 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,663 0 3 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,659 0 2
26 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,563 0 3 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,644 0 2
27 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2
28 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,633 0 2
29 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3
30 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,646 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,560 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,630 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,622 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,591 0 3