H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Meike Babel vs Camille Benjamin H2H: 0-1
Camille Benjamin holds a 1–0 lead over Meike Babel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Camille Benjamin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Camille Benjamin won the 1992 Key Biscayne first round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 60
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 1992* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Camille Benjamin | 6-4 7-5 | Meike Babel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meike Babel | #446 | #27 | 377 | 1,784 | 71 | 86 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Camille Benjamin | #1,000 | #27 | 13 | 1,834 | 177 | 223 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Meike Babel | Camille Benjamin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #86 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 22–25 | 46.8% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #49 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #46 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 22–29 | 43.1% | #62 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #79 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #67 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #116 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #91 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #92 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #136 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #425 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #251 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #276 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |