H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Meike Babel vs Elena Makarova H2H: 1-1
Meike Babel and Elena Makarova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elena Makarova leads 1–0 on carpet, while Meike Babel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Meike Babel won the 1995 Amelia Island third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 53
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 1995* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Meike Babel | 6-4 6-1 | Elena Makarova | Match data |
| Oct 21, 1993* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Elena Makarova | 6-2 6-1 | Meike Babel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meike Babel | #446 | #27 | 377 | 1,784 | 71 | 86 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Elena Makarova | — | — | — | 1,755 | 59 | 72 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Meike Babel | Elena Makarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #86 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #49 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #46 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 14–13 | 51.9% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #116 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #425 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |