H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Meike Babel vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 0-2

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 2–0 lead over Meike Babel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1995 Wimbledon second round 7-5 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Meike Babel
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 30, 1995* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Kimiko Date Krumm 7-5 7-6 Meike Babel #33 Match data
Sep 2, 1992* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-1 6-0 Meike Babel #68 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Meike Babel #446 #27 377 1,784 71 86 45.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Meike Babel Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1991 0–2 0.0% #134 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1992 10–18 35.7% #86 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1993 17–15 53.1% #49 1,623 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 1994 13–12 52.0% #46 1,662 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 1995 14–10 58.3% #32 1,751 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 1997 7–8 46.7% #116 1,703 0 0 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 1998 9–16 36.0% #100 1,634 0 0 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 — — — — — — — 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 2000 1–5 16.7% #425 1,563 0 0 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8