H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Meike Babel vs Leila Meskhi H2H: 3-0
Meike Babel holds a 3–0 lead over Leila Meskhi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Meike Babel leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Meike Babel won the 1994 Linz quarterfinal 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
GEO
Age 58
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 1994* | Linz | WTA 500 | QF | Carpet | Meike Babel | 7-5 6-3 | Leila Meskhi | Match data |
| Aug 28, 1993* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Meike Babel | 7-5 6-2 | Leila Meskhi | Match data |
| May 13, 1993* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Meike Babel | 6-4 6-4 | Leila Meskhi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meike Babel | #446 | #27 | 377 | 1,784 | 71 | 86 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Leila Meskhi | #903 | #12 | 72 | 2,001 | 192 | 119 | 61.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Meike Babel | Leila Meskhi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #86 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1993 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #49 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #46 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #46 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1997 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #116 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #19 | 1,928 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1998 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2000 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #425 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #37 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,834 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #838 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 |