H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Meike Babel vs Mareen Louie Harper H2H: 1-0
Meike Babel holds a 1–0 lead over Mareen Louie Harper in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Meike Babel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Meike Babel won the 1992 San Antonio third round 6-3 6-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 65
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 1992* | San Antonio | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Meike Babel | 6-3 6-7 6-4 | Mareen Louie Harper | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meike Babel | #446 | #27 | 377 | 1,784 | 71 | 86 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mareen Louie Harper | — | — | — | 1,911 | 177 | 239 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Meike Babel | Mareen Louie Harper | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #86 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #49 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #46 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 22–23 | 48.9% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 16–20 | 44.4% | — | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 9–18 | 33.3% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #116 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 29–18 | 61.7% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2000 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #425 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 2 |