H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Meike Babel vs Sabine Hack H2H: 0-2
Sabine Hack holds a 2–0 lead over Meike Babel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sabine Hack leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Sabine Hack won the 1994 Hamburg fourth round 6-3 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 1994* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Sabine Hack | 6-3 3-6 6-1 | Meike Babel | Match data |
| May 21, 1993* | Lucerne | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Sabine Hack | 6-4 6-1 | Meike Babel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meike Babel | #446 | #27 | 377 | 1,784 | 71 | 86 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sabine Hack | #523 | #13 | 577 | 1,996 | 180 | 135 | 57.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Meike Babel | Sabine Hack | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 5–1 | 83.3% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #262 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #86 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1993 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #49 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #146 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1994 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #46 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #74 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1995 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #45 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #59 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1997 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #116 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #35 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1998 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #24 | 1,854 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2000 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #425 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #40 | 1,729 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #43 | 1,706 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #523 | 1,648 | 0 | 5 |