H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Meike Babel vs Wiltrud Probst H2H: 0-2
Wiltrud Probst holds a 2–0 lead over Meike Babel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Wiltrud Probst leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Wiltrud Probst won the 1995 Houston fourth round 5-7 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 1995* | Houston | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Wiltrud Probst | 5-7 7-5 6-2 | Meike Babel | Match data |
| May 10, 1992* | Waregem | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Wiltrud Probst | 6-2 6-3 | Meike Babel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meike Babel | #446 | #27 | 377 | 1,784 | 71 | 86 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wiltrud Probst | #794 | #31 | 344 | 1,757 | 119 | 161 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Meike Babel | Wiltrud Probst | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #86 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #49 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #46 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #80 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1997 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #116 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1998 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #105 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2000 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #425 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #69 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #146 | 1,616 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #113 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |