H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Meilen Tu vs Andrea Temesvari H2H: 0-1
Andrea Temesvari holds a 1–0 lead over Meilen Tu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Temesvari leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Temesvari won the 1995 German Open third round 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 48
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 60
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 1995* | German Open | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Andrea Temesvari | 6-3 7-6 | Meilen Tu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meilen Tu | #1,136 | #35 | 769 | 1,692 | 103 | 163 | 38.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Andrea Temesvari | #932 | #7 | 109 | 2,021 | 185 | 178 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Meilen Tu | Andrea Temesvari | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #160 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1995 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #161 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 42–15 | 73.7% | — | 1,988 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1997 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #81 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #209 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1999 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #103 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,762 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2000 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #67 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #45 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #43 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2002 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2003 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,478 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2004 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,464 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,616 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2005 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2006 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2007 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #47 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,487 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #630 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #181 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #940 | 1,533 | 0 | 5 |