H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Meilen Tu vs Angelica Gavaldon H2H: 1-0

Meilen Tu holds a 1–0 lead over Angelica Gavaldon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Meilen Tu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Meilen Tu won the 1997 Oklahoma round of 32 6-2 2-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Meilen Tu
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Angelica Gavaldon
MEX Age 52 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Meilen Tu #112 6-2 2-6 7-5 Angelica Gavaldon #205 Match data Feb 20, 1997* R32 Oklahoma Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Meilen Tu #1,136 #35 769 1,692 103 163 38.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Angelica Gavaldon #434 #34 237 1,735 75 111 40.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Meilen Tu Angelica Gavaldon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1988 1–3 25.0% #264 1,499 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1989 2–4 33.3% #191 1,501 0 0
16 1994 2–3 40.0% #160 1,542 0 0 1990 16–16 50.0% #51 1,601 0 0
17 1995 3–10 23.1% #161 1,506 0 0 1991 1–6 14.3% #242 1,556 0 0
18 1996 2–3 40.0% #157 1,518 0 0 1992 5–10 33.3% #142 1,577 0 0
19 1997 6–13 31.6% #81 1,520 0 0 1993 19–20 48.7% #64 1,613 0 0
20 1998 2–3 40.0% #209 1,533 0 0 1994 9–16 36.0% #119 1,605 0 0
21 1999 3–11 21.4% #103 1,484 0 0 1995 17–17 50.0% #36 1,677 0 0
22 2000 6–9 40.0% #67 1,576 0 0 1996 3–11 21.4% #219 1,593 0 0
23 2001 25–23 52.1% #45 1,615 0 1 1997 1–5 16.7% #107 1,527 0 0
24 2002 16–24 40.0% #73 1,561 0 1 1998 0–1 0.0% #697 1,521 0 0
25 2003 4–14 22.2% #143 1,478 0 1 1999 0–1 0.0% #379 1,515 0 0
26 2004 2–4 33.3% #162 1,464 0 1 2000 1–1 50.0% #261 1,526 0 0
27 2005 4–9 30.8% #120 1,473 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2006 7–9 43.8% #90 1,532 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2007 20–22 47.6% #47 1,626 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2008 1–6 14.3% #630 1,548 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Meilen Tu Angelica Gavaldon
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1990 13 10 23 56.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
17 1995 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1997 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 12 11 23 52.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
20 1998 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 7 9 16 43.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 12 9 21 57.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1997 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2002 7 13 20 35.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2003 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2004 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 60 96 156 38.5% 18 37 55 32.7% 17 17 34 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1% — 55 71 126 43.7% 13 21 34 38.2% 5 9 14 35.7% 2 10 12 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Meilen Tu Angelica Gavaldon
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1500 105.9 — — — — +36 — — 33.3% -1.44 0–1 0–1 — +0.09
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1501 104.0 — — — — +24 — — 35.7% -1.14 1–1 1–0 — +0.22
16 1994 1543 126.0 — — — — +32 — — 45.5% -0.36 0–1 1–0 — -0.21 1990 1601 123.4 — — — — +41 -70 -31 48.0% -0.39 7–4 (64%) 2–2 (50%) 105.8 +1.11
17 1995 1506 118.5 — — — — +10 — +85 33.3% -0.47 0–6 (0%) 0–5 (0%) 91.1 -0.04 1991 1557 107.9 — — — — +21 — — 23.5% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.31
18 1996 1518 108.5 — — — — +9 — — 36.4% -0.64 1–0 — — +0.25 1992 1578 119.9 — — — — -6 -9 — 29.0% -1.29 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -0.47
19 1997 1520 114.3 — — — — +34 — — 37.0% -1.07 3–5 (38%) 2–0 — -0.01 1993 1613 127.0 — — — — +4 -19 -41 49.4% -0.03 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) 99.4 +0.85
20 1998 1533 111.4 — — — — +25 — — 46.2% -0.61 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.08 1994 1605 119.4 — — — — +7 -4 — 35.3% -0.88 3–0 (100%) 1–6 (14%) 100.2 -0.02
21 1999 1485 108.0 — — — — +29 -18 — 28.1% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.21 1995 1678 132.9 — — — — 0 -76 -137 48.6% -0.23 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 106.9 +0.35
22 2000 1576 129.8 — — — — -11 -88 — 35.5% -0.87 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -1.26 1996 1593 116.6 — — — — +13 — — 25.8% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 96.1 -0.12
23 2001 1615 124.8 — — — — +19 -100 -43 50.4% +0.09 15–12 (56%) 6–13 (32%) 98.8 +2.97 1997 1528 94.3 — — — — +25 +52 — 28.6% -1.79 0–2 — — +0.66
24 2002 1562 120.2 — — — — +9 -52 +23 41.5% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 8–3 (73%) 98.2 +0.86 1998 1522 — — — — — — — — — — — — — -0.13
25 2003 1478 102.5 -0.75 +0.07 0.979 49.4% +37 -53 — 27.9% -1.28 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.08 1999 1515 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.20
26 2004 1464 95.0 — — — — +44 — — 30.8% -1.77 1–0 1–0 — +0.51 2000 1526 104.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.40 1–0 — — +0.09
27 2005 1473 93.5 -1.15 -2.22 0.738 43.7% +25 — +71 35.7% -1.64 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.9 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2006 1532 114.0 -1.42 -1.20 0.896 47.6% -68 — +139 44.4% -0.92 2–2 (50%) 4–0 (100%) 103.6 +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 1627 128.6 +0.38 +1.07 1.029 50.8% -79 -65 +74 48.4% -0.01 6–5 (55%) 5–4 (56%) 104.1 -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 1548 100.4 -1.42 -2.70 0.835 46.2% -63 — — 23.5% -1.47 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1693 123.2 -0.22 +0.15 0.969 49.4% 0 -69 +60 40.9% -0.65 40–51 (44%) 34–31 (52%) 102.6 +1.17 — 1735 127.2 — — — — +13 -28 -69 41.0% -0.69 25–21 (54%) 14–21 (40%) 101.4 +1.14

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.