H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Meilen Tu vs Anne Miller H2H: 1-0

Meilen Tu holds a 1–0 lead over Anne Miller in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Meilen Tu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Meilen Tu won the 1997 Key Biscayne round of 128 7-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Meilen Tu
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Anne Miller
USA Age 49

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Meilen Tu #100 7-6 6-1 Anne Miller Match data Mar 21, 1997* R128 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Meilen Tu #1,136 #35 769 1,692 103 163 38.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Anne Miller — — — 1,700 29 53 35.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Meilen Tu Anne Miller
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1994 2–3 40.0% #160 1,542 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% — 1,498 0 0
17 1995 3–10 23.1% #161 1,506 0 0 1994 0–2 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
18 1996 2–3 40.0% #157 1,518 0 0 1995 3–7 30.0% — 1,493 0 0
19 1997 6–13 31.6% #81 1,520 0 0 1996 9–12 42.9% — 1,612 0 0
20 1998 2–3 40.0% #209 1,533 0 0 1997 3–13 18.8% — 1,552 0 0
21 1999 3–11 21.4% #103 1,484 0 0 1998 13–15 46.4% — 1,646 0 0
22 2000 6–9 40.0% #67 1,576 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% — 1,638 0 0
23 2001 25–23 52.1% #45 1,615 0 1 2000 1–2 33.3% — 1,639 0 0
24 2002 16–24 40.0% #73 1,561 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 2003 4–14 22.2% #143 1,478 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 2004 2–4 33.3% #162 1,464 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2005 4–9 30.8% #120 1,473 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2006 7–9 43.8% #90 1,532 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2007 20–22 47.6% #47 1,626 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2008 1–6 14.3% #630 1,548 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Meilen Tu Anne Miller
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1995 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1997 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
20 1998 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 10 12 16.7% — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 8 7 15 53.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2002 7 13 20 35.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2003 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2004 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 60 96 156 38.5% 18 37 55 32.7% 17 17 34 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1% — 13 28 41 31.7% 8 11 19 42.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 10 16 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Meilen Tu Anne Miller
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1994 1543 126.0 — — — — +32 — — 45.5% -0.36 0–1 1–0 — -0.21 1993 1498 107.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.10
17 1995 1506 118.5 — — — — +10 — +85 33.3% -0.47 0–6 (0%) 0–5 (0%) 91.1 -0.04 1994 1480 101.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — 0.00
18 1996 1518 108.5 — — — — +9 — — 36.4% -0.64 1–0 — — +0.25 1995 1493 115.1 — — — — +32 — — 28.6% -1.33 1–0 0–1 — -0.26
19 1997 1520 114.3 — — — — +34 — — 37.0% -1.07 3–5 (38%) 2–0 — -0.01 1996 1613 136.3 — — — — -21 -27 -20 45.7% -0.47 2–3 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 101.9 -0.69
20 1998 1533 111.4 — — — — +25 — — 46.2% -0.61 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.08 1997 1552 119.3 — — — — -17 — — 24.3% -1.76 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 99.2 -0.49
21 1999 1485 108.0 — — — — +29 -18 — 28.1% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.21 1998 1646 131.4 — — — — -41 -32 -45 44.3% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.76
22 2000 1576 129.8 — — — — -11 -88 — 35.5% -0.87 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -1.26 1999 1639 107.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.25
23 2001 1615 124.8 — — — — +19 -100 -43 50.4% +0.09 15–12 (56%) 6–13 (32%) 98.8 +2.97 2000 1639 105.4 — — — — -35 — — 28.6% -2.29 1–0 — — 0.00
24 2002 1562 120.2 — — — — +9 -52 +23 41.5% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 8–3 (73%) 98.2 +0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2003 1478 102.5 -0.75 +0.07 0.979 49.4% +37 -53 — 27.9% -1.28 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2004 1464 95.0 — — — — +44 — — 30.8% -1.77 1–0 1–0 — +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 1473 93.5 -1.15 -2.22 0.738 43.7% +25 — +71 35.7% -1.64 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.9 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2006 1532 114.0 -1.42 -1.20 0.896 47.6% -68 — +139 44.4% -0.92 2–2 (50%) 4–0 (100%) 103.6 +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 1627 128.6 +0.38 +1.07 1.029 50.8% -79 -65 +74 48.4% -0.01 6–5 (55%) 5–4 (56%) 104.1 -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 1548 100.4 -1.42 -2.70 0.835 46.2% -63 — — 23.5% -1.47 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1693 123.2 -0.22 +0.15 0.969 49.4% 0 -69 +60 40.9% -0.65 40–51 (44%) 34–31 (52%) 102.6 +1.17 — 1701 132.8 — — — — -17 -30 -33 36.8% -0.93 10–11 (48%) 4–10 (29%) 101.5 -3.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.