H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Meilen Tu vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 0-1
Asa Carlsson holds a 1–0 lead over Meilen Tu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Asa Carlsson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Asa Carlsson won the 1997 Key Biscayne second round 5-7 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 48
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 1997* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Asa Carlsson | 5-7 6-1 6-4 | Meilen Tu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meilen Tu | #1,136 | #35 | 769 | 1,692 | 103 | 163 | 38.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Meilen Tu | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #160 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #161 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #81 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #209 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #103 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #67 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #45 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,478 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,464 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| 2005 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 |
| 2006 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |
| 2007 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #47 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #630 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |