H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Meilen Tu vs Catalina Cristea H2H: 1-0

Meilen Tu holds a 1–0 lead over Catalina Cristea in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Meilen Tu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Meilen Tu won the 1996 Indian Wells Open round of 64 6-1 4-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Meilen Tu
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Catalina Cristea
ROM Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Meilen Tu #152 6-1 4-6 6-1 Catalina Cristea #108 Match data Mar 13, 1996* R64 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Meilen Tu #1,136 #35 769 1,692 103 163 38.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Catalina Cristea #687 #59 440 1,632 49 99 33.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Meilen Tu Catalina Cristea
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1994 2–3 40.0% #160 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1995 3–10 23.1% #161 1,506 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #430 1,496 0 0
18 1996 2–3 40.0% #157 1,518 0 0 1993 5–4 55.6% #127 1,558 0 0
19 1997 6–13 31.6% #81 1,520 0 0 1994 2–9 18.2% #189 1,513 0 0
20 1998 2–3 40.0% #209 1,533 0 0 1995 5–10 33.3% #106 1,518 0 0
21 1999 3–11 21.4% #103 1,484 0 0 1996 6–13 31.6% #97 1,534 0 0
22 2000 6–9 40.0% #67 1,576 0 0 1997 11–19 36.7% #77 1,565 0 0
23 2001 25–23 52.1% #45 1,615 0 1 1998 11–17 39.3% #67 1,618 0 0
24 2002 16–24 40.0% #73 1,561 0 1 1999 5–15 25.0% #127 1,520 0 0
25 2003 4–14 22.2% #143 1,478 0 1 2000 4–11 26.7% #119 1,490 0 0
26 2004 2–4 33.3% #162 1,464 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2005 4–9 30.8% #120 1,473 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2006 7–9 43.8% #90 1,532 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2007 20–22 47.6% #47 1,626 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2008 1–6 14.3% #630 1,548 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Meilen Tu Catalina Cristea
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1995 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1997 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 2 7 9 22.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1998 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 1 5 6 16.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 3 7 10 30.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1998 2 6 8 25.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2002 7 13 20 35.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1999 2 6 8 25.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2003 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2004 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 60 96 156 38.5% 18 37 55 32.7% 17 17 34 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1% — 20 47 67 29.9% 23 35 58 39.7% 4 10 14 28.6% 2 7 9 22.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Meilen Tu Catalina Cristea
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1994 1543 126.0 — — — — +32 — — 45.5% -0.36 0–1 1–0 — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1995 1506 118.5 — — — — +10 — +85 33.3% -0.47 0–6 (0%) 0–5 (0%) 91.1 -0.04 1992 1497 104.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.23
18 1996 1518 108.5 — — — — +9 — — 36.4% -0.64 1–0 — — +0.25 1993 1559 105.5 — — — — +30 — — 42.1% -0.68 3–0 (100%) 1–0 — +0.12
19 1997 1520 114.3 — — — — +34 — — 37.0% -1.07 3–5 (38%) 2–0 — -0.01 1994 1513 115.1 — — — — +40 — — 28.0% -1.60 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 98.5 -0.35
20 1998 1533 111.4 — — — — +25 — — 46.2% -0.61 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.08 1995 1519 114.8 — — — — -17 +68 — 33.3% -1.33 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.41
21 1999 1485 108.0 — — — — +29 -18 — 28.1% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.21 1996 1535 120.1 — — — — -48 +70 +46 37.0% -0.93 3–5 (38%) 1–1 — -0.65
22 2000 1576 129.8 — — — — -11 -88 — 35.5% -0.87 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -1.26 1997 1566 121.5 — — — — -73 +71 -7 39.7% -0.97 3–7 (30%) 4–3 (57%) 98.3 -0.25
23 2001 1615 124.8 — — — — +19 -100 -43 50.4% +0.09 15–12 (56%) 6–13 (32%) 98.8 +2.97 1998 1618 121.7 — — — — -92 +40 -69 37.7% -1.02 4–3 (57%) 2–1 (67%) 103.9 -1.32
24 2002 1562 120.2 — — — — +9 -52 +23 41.5% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 8–3 (73%) 98.2 +0.86 1999 1521 107.5 — — — — -32 +88 — 30.4% -1.39 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 97.3 +0.08
25 2003 1478 102.5 -0.75 +0.07 0.979 49.4% +37 -53 — 27.9% -1.28 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.08 2000 1491 103.1 — — — — +1 +50 — 27.3% -1.79 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — -0.55
26 2004 1464 95.0 — — — — +44 — — 30.8% -1.77 1–0 1–0 — +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 1473 93.5 -1.15 -2.22 0.738 43.7% +25 — +71 35.7% -1.64 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.9 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2006 1532 114.0 -1.42 -1.20 0.896 47.6% -68 — +139 44.4% -0.92 2–2 (50%) 4–0 (100%) 103.6 +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 1627 128.6 +0.38 +1.07 1.029 50.8% -79 -65 +74 48.4% -0.01 6–5 (55%) 5–4 (56%) 104.1 -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 1548 100.4 -1.42 -2.70 0.835 46.2% -63 — — 23.5% -1.47 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1693 123.2 -0.22 +0.15 0.969 49.4% 0 -69 +60 40.9% -0.65 40–51 (44%) 34–31 (52%) 102.6 +1.17 — 1632 120.5 — — — — -27 +64 -16 34.8% -1.19 19–26 (42%) 14–11 (56%) 102.1 -2.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.