H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Meilen Tu vs Els Callens H2H: 2-0

Meilen Tu holds a 2–0 lead over Els Callens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Meilen Tu leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Meilen Tu won the 2001 Waikoloa round of 32 3-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Meilen Tu
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Els Callens
BEL Age 56 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Meilen Tu #46 3-6 6-3 6-2 Els Callens #177 Match data Sep 13, 2001* R32 Waikoloa Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Meilen Tu #127 6-3 6-0 Els Callens #78 Match data Nov 2, 1995* R32 Quebec City Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Meilen Tu #1,136 #35 769 1,692 103 163 38.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Els Callens #473 #43 582 1,715 83 128 39.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Meilen Tu Els Callens
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1994 2–3 40.0% #160 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1995 3–10 23.1% #161 1,506 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1996 2–3 40.0% #157 1,518 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 6–13 31.6% #81 1,520 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1998 2–3 40.0% #209 1,533 0 0 1991 1–1 50.0% #168 1,509 0 0
21 1999 3–11 21.4% #103 1,484 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #231 1,492 0 0
22 2000 6–9 40.0% #67 1,576 0 0 1993 2–1 66.7% #188 1,513 0 0
23 2001 25–23 52.1% #45 1,615 0 1 1994 4–3 57.1% #110 1,560 0 0
24 2002 16–24 40.0% #73 1,561 0 1 1995 8–11 42.1% #95 1,551 0 0
25 2003 4–14 22.2% #143 1,478 0 1 1996 13–12 52.0% #51 1,692 0 0
26 2004 2–4 33.3% #162 1,464 0 1 1997 8–16 33.3% #98 1,579 0 0
27 2005 4–9 30.8% #120 1,473 0 1 1998 2–8 20.0% #102 1,525 0 0
28 2006 7–9 43.8% #90 1,532 0 1 1999 7–9 43.8% #82 1,569 0 0
29 2007 20–22 47.6% #47 1,626 0 1 2000 8–13 38.1% #100 1,564 0 0
30 2008 1–6 14.3% #630 1,548 0 1 2001 2–6 25.0% #177 1,522 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2002 9–10 47.4% #67 1,606 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2003 13–19 40.6% #73 1,637 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2004 5–15 25.0% #122 1,539 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2005 1–3 25.0% #224 1,521 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Meilen Tu Els Callens
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1995 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
23 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1994 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
24 2002 7 13 20 35.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1995 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 2003 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
26 2004 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 2007 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2000 5 6 11 45.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2008 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 4 7 11 36.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 3 9 12 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 60 96 156 38.5% 18 37 55 32.7% 17 17 34 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1% — 26 49 75 34.7% 15 29 44 34.1% 19 23 42 45.2% 23 27 50 46.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Meilen Tu Els Callens
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1994 1543 126.0 — — — — +32 — — 45.5% -0.36 0–1 1–0 — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1995 1506 118.5 — — — — +10 — +85 33.3% -0.47 0–6 (0%) 0–5 (0%) 91.1 -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 1518 108.5 — — — — +9 — — 36.4% -0.64 1–0 — — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1520 114.3 — — — — +34 — — 37.0% -1.07 3–5 (38%) 2–0 — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 1533 111.4 — — — — +25 — — 46.2% -0.61 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.08 1991 1509 97.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–1 — +0.24
21 1999 1485 108.0 — — — — +29 -18 — 28.1% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.21 1992 1493 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06
22 2000 1576 129.8 — — — — -11 -88 — 35.5% -0.87 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -1.26 1993 1514 102.8 — — — — +47 — — 57.1% +0.14 1–0 — — +0.46
23 2001 1615 124.8 — — — — +19 -100 -43 50.4% +0.09 15–12 (56%) 6–13 (32%) 98.8 +2.97 1994 1561 113.2 — — — — +25 — — 56.3% +0.63 1–1 1–0 — -0.16
24 2002 1562 120.2 — — — — +9 -52 +23 41.5% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 8–3 (73%) 98.2 +0.86 1995 1551 116.0 — — — — -68 +43 +105 45.2% -0.24 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.58
25 2003 1478 102.5 -0.75 +0.07 0.979 49.4% +37 -53 — 27.9% -1.28 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.08 1996 1692 128.2 — — — — -52 -110 +3 48.1% -0.30 4–2 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 103.8 +0.50
26 2004 1464 95.0 — — — — +44 — — 30.8% -1.77 1–0 1–0 — +0.51 1997 1579 109.4 — — — — +17 -21 +72 33.3% -1.26 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.4 +0.32
27 2005 1473 93.5 -1.15 -2.22 0.738 43.7% +25 — +71 35.7% -1.64 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.9 -0.07 1998 1525 102.8 — — — — +21 — — 34.8% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — +0.31
28 2006 1532 114.0 -1.42 -1.20 0.896 47.6% -68 — +139 44.4% -0.92 2–2 (50%) 4–0 (100%) 103.6 +0.38 1999 1570 122.3 — — — — -17 +45 — 44.4% -0.08 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.02
29 2007 1627 128.6 +0.38 +1.07 1.029 50.8% -79 -65 +74 48.4% -0.01 6–5 (55%) 5–4 (56%) 104.1 -0.11 2000 1565 124.4 — — — — +8 +10 -5 44.9% -0.06 1–6 (14%) 2–4 (33%) 93.3 -0.24
30 2008 1548 100.4 -1.42 -2.70 0.835 46.2% -63 — — 23.5% -1.47 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.20 2001 1523 118.1 — — — — +25 +26 — 33.3% -0.72 0–2 0–2 — -0.05
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1606 123.2 — — — — +7 -75 -6 42.6% -0.40 7–2 (78%) 2–3 (40%) 105.1 -0.33
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1637 127.2 -0.92 -1.45 0.759 44.5% +8 -178 +36 41.1% -0.48 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 102.9 -1.93
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1539 102.6 -1.13 -2.60 0.779 44.6% +15 -107 +61 33.3% -1.44 2–6 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 97.1 -0.15
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1522 96.0 -1.14 -3.36 0.793 46.2% +16 — — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–1 — +0.11
Career — 1693 123.2 -0.22 +0.15 0.969 49.4% 0 -69 +60 40.9% -0.65 40–51 (44%) 34–31 (52%) 102.6 +1.17 — 1716 123.9 -1.05 -2.22 0.772 44.7% -2 -39 +39 41.1% -0.57 30–36 (45%) 22–25 (47%) 98.5 -0.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.