H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Meilen Tu vs Els Callens H2H: 2-0
Meilen Tu holds a 2–0 lead over Els Callens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Meilen Tu leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Meilen Tu won the 2001 Waikoloa third round 3-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 48
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2001* | Waikoloa | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Meilen Tu | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Els Callens | Match data |
| Nov 2, 1995* | Canadian Open | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Meilen Tu | 6-3 6-0 | Els Callens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meilen Tu | #1,136 | #35 | 769 | 1,692 | 103 | 163 | 38.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Els Callens | #473 | #43 | 582 | 1,716 | 82 | 127 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Meilen Tu | Els Callens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #160 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #161 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #81 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #209 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #103 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #67 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #188 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #45 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #110 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #95 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,478 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #51 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,464 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #102 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #47 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #100 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #630 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #67 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #73 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #224 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |