H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Meilen Tu vs Katerina Maleeva H2H: 1-1
Meilen Tu and Katerina Maleeva are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Meilen Tu leads 1–0 on carpet, while Katerina Maleeva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Katerina Maleeva won the 1995 Indian Wells third round 6-4 2-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 48
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BUL
Age 57
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 1995* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Katerina Maleeva | 6-4 2-6 7-6 | Meilen Tu | Match data |
| Nov 11, 1994* | Philadelphia | WTA 1000 | R16 | Carpet | Meilen Tu | 6-4 6-3 | Katerina Maleeva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meilen Tu | #1,136 | #35 | 769 | 1,692 | 103 | 163 | 38.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Katerina Maleeva | #456 | #6 | 116 | 2,070 | 324 | 185 | 63.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Meilen Tu | Katerina Maleeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #160 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1995 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #161 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,838 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #13 | 1,948 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1997 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #81 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,992 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #209 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 32–11 | 74.4% | #15 | 1,940 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1999 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #103 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,039 | 0 | 9 |
| 22 | 2000 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #67 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,967 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 2001 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #45 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,906 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 2002 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #22 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 |
| 25 | 2003 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,478 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,866 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 2004 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,464 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #302 | 1,679 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 2005 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #231 | 1,686 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 2006 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #47 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #630 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |