H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Meilen Tu vs Liezel Huber H2H: 1-0

Meilen Tu holds a 1–0 lead over Liezel Huber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Meilen Tu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Meilen Tu won the 2001 Toyota Princess Cup round of 16 6-7(6) 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Meilen Tu

USA Age 48 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H

1 – 0

1 main-draw meetings

Liezel Huber

USA Age 50 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Meilen Tu #44	6-7(6) 6-1 7-5	Liezel Huber #294	Match data	Sep 21, 2001*	R16	Toyota Princess Cup	Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500	Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Meilen Tu	#1,136	#35	769	1,692	103	163	38.7%	0	0	0	0	1	1
Liezel Huber	#772	#131	242	1,500	4	13	23.5%	0	0	0	0	0	0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Meilen Tu							Liezel Huber
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
16	1994	2–3	40.0%	#160	1,542	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1995	3–10	23.1%	#161	1,506	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1996	2–3	40.0%	#157	1,518	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1997	6–13	31.6%	#81	1,520	0	0	1996	0–1	0.0%	#212	1,487	0	0
20	1998	2–3	40.0%	#209	1,533	0	0	1997	0–1	0.0%	#156	1,482	0	0
21	1999	3–11	21.4%	#103	1,484	0	0	1998	1–5	16.7%	#150	1,450	0	0
22	2000	6–9	40.0%	#67	1,576	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	2001	25–23	52.1%	#45	1,615	0	1	2000	0–2	0.0%	#438	1,430	0	0
24	2002	16–24	40.0%	#73	1,561	0	1	2001	3–4	42.9%	#176	1,476	0	0
25	2003	4–14	22.2%	#143	1,478	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	2004	2–4	33.3%	#162	1,464	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	2005	4–9	30.8%	#120	1,473	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	2006	7–9	43.8%	#90	1,532	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	2007	20–22	47.6%	#47	1,626	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	2008	1–6	14.3%	#630	1,548	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Meilen Tu																	Liezel Huber
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
16	1994	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1995	0	5	5	0.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	2	1	3	66.7%	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1996	1	1	2	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1997	6	8	14	42.9%	0	2	2	0.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1996	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
20	1998	2	3	5	40.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1997	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
21	1999	3	8	11	27.3%	0	3	3	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1998	0	3	3	0.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
22	2000	4	6	10	40.0%	2	3	5	40.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	2001	16	13	29	55.2%	5	6	11	45.5%	2	3	5	40.0%	2	1	3	66.7%	2000	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	2002	7	13	20	35.0%	3	5	8	37.5%	3	3	6	50.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	2001	3	3	6	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	2003	3	7	10	30.0%	0	5	5	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	2004	2	3	5	40.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	2005	3	5	8	37.5%	0	2	2	0.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	2006	1	5	6	16.7%	1	1	2	50.0%	5	2	7	71.4%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	2007	11	13	24	45.8%	6	6	12	50.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	2008	1	5	6	16.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	60	96	156	38.5%	18	37	55	32.7%	17	17	34	50.0%	8	13	21	38.1%	—	3	8	11	27.3%	1	4	5	20.0%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Meilen Tu																Liezel Huber
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
16	1994	1543	126.0	—	—	—	—	+32	—	—	45.5%	-0.36	0–1	1–0	—	-0.21	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1995	1506	118.5	—	—	—	—	+10	—	+85	33.3%	-0.47	0–6 (0%)	0–5 (0%)	91.1	-0.04	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1996	1518	108.5	—	—	—	—	+9	—	—	36.4%	-0.64	1–0	—	—	+0.25	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1997	1520	114.3	—	—	—	—	+34	—	—	37.0%	-1.07	3–5 (38%)	2–0	—	-0.01	1996	1488	98.6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	33.3%	0.00	0–1	0–1	—	+0.17
20	1998	1533	111.4	—	—	—	—	+25	—	—	46.2%	-0.61	1–2 (33%)	1–0	—	-0.08	1997	1483	101.4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	33.3%	-1.33	0–1	—	—	-0.19
21	1999	1485	108.0	—	—	—	—	+29	-18	—	28.1%	-1.50	1–3 (25%)	1–1	—	-0.21	1998	1450	96.4	—	—	—	—	+12	+102	—	21.4%	-2.14	1–1	1–0	—	+0.28
22	2000	1576	129.8	—	—	—	—	-11	-88	—	35.5%	-0.87	2–1 (67%)	2–0	—	-1.26	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	2001	1615	124.8	—	—	—	—	+19	-100	-43	50.4%	+0.09	15–12 (56%)	6–13 (32%)	98.8	+2.97	2000	1431	97.5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-2.25	—	0–1	—	+0.06
24	2002	1562	120.2	—	—	—	—	+9	-52	+23	41.5%	-0.83	2–6 (25%)	8–3 (73%)	98.2	+0.86	2001	1476	110.6	—	—	—	—	+14	—	—	50.0%	-0.19	0–2	1–0	—	+0.03
25	2003	1478	102.5	-0.75	+0.07	0.979	49.4%	+37	-53	—	27.9%	-1.28	3–4 (43%)	1–3 (25%)	—	-0.08	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	2004	1464	95.0	—	—	—	—	+44	—	—	30.8%	-1.77	1–0	1–0	—	+0.51	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	2005	1473	93.5	-1.15	-2.22	0.738	43.7%	+25	—	+71	35.7%	-1.64	2–2 (50%)	2–1 (67%)	101.9	-0.07	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	2006	1532	114.0	-1.42	-1.20	0.896	47.6%	-68	—	+139	44.4%	-0.92	2–2 (50%)	4–0 (100%)	103.6	+0.38	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	2007	1627	128.6	+0.38	+1.07	1.029	50.8%	-79	-65	+74	48.4%	-0.01	6–5 (55%)	5–4 (56%)	104.1	-0.11	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	2008	1548	100.4	-1.42	-2.70	0.835	46.2%	-63	—	—	23.5%	-1.47	1–2 (33%)	0–1	—	+0.20	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	1693	123.2	-0.22	+0.15	0.969	49.4%	0	-69	+60	40.9%	-0.65	40–51 (44%)	34–31 (52%)	102.6	+1.17	—	1500	102.5	—	—	—	—	+13	+102	—	32.5%	-1.15	1–5 (17%)	2–2 (50%)	96.5	+2.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Meilen Tu's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Amy Frazier	2	4	6	Apr 12, 2006	H2H
Meghann Shaughnessy	2	3	5	Jul 26, 2007	H2H
Shahar Peer	0	4	4	Aug 29, 2007	H2H
Venus Williams	0	4	4	Apr 6, 2007	H2H
Tatiana Poutchek	3	1	4	Mar 6, 2007	H2H

Liezel Huber's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Adriana Rikl Gersi	1	1	2	Nov 8, 2001	H2H
Henrieta Nagyova	0	1	1	Nov 10, 2001	H2H
Ai Sugiyama	1	0	1	Nov 9, 2001	H2H
Meilen Tu	0	1	1	Sep 21, 2001	H2H
Iroda Tulyaganova	1	0	1	Sep 20, 2001	H2H