Meilen Tu
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amy Frazier | 2 | 4 | 6 | Apr 12, 2006 | H2H |
| Meghann Shaughnessy | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jul 26, 2007 | H2H |
| Shahar Peer | 0 | 4 | 4 | Aug 29, 2007 | H2H |
| Venus Williams | 0 | 4 | 4 | Apr 6, 2007 | H2H |
| Tatiana Poutchek | 3 | 1 | 4 | Mar 6, 2007 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Meilen Tu holds a 1–0 lead over María Emilia Salerni in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Meilen Tu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Meilen Tu won the 2001 ASB Classic round of 16 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meilen Tu | 6-2 6-4 | María Emilia Salerni | Match data | Jan 4, 2001* | R16 | ASB Classic | Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meilen Tu | #1,136 | #35 | 769 | 1,692 | 103 | 163 | 38.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| María Emilia Salerni | #328 | #65 | 471 | 1,556 | 31 | 61 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Meilen Tu | María Emilia Salerni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #160 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #161 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #122 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #81 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #209 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #103 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #115 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #67 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #148 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #45 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,478 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #241 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,464 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #330 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,473 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2006 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #47 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #630 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Meilen Tu | María Emilia Salerni | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1994 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2000 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2001 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2002 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 1998 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3 | 12 | 15 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 16 | 13 | 29 | 55.2% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2007 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2003 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2008 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2004 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2006 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 45.8% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 60 | 96 | 156 | 38.5% | 18 | 37 | 55 | 32.7% | 17 | 17 | 34 | 50.0% | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | — | 13 | 31 | 44 | 29.5% | 18 | 27 | 45 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 58/96 of Meilen Tu's and 14/51 of María Emilia Salerni's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Meilen Tu | María Emilia Salerni | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1/6 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 54.9% | 64.3% | 30.4% | 16.7% | 14.3% | 49.0% | 33.3% |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2/17 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 57.6% | 49.4% | 41.0% | 60.7% | 28.6% | 46.1% | 35.1% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3/12 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 67.3% | 63.0% | 35.7% | 65.8% | 42.2% | 54.0% | 39.2% |
| 25 | 2003 | 1/18 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 63.2% | 53.5% | 44.0% | 36.4% | 28.6% | 50.0% | 48.9% | 2008 | 5/12 | 2.0 | 2.8 | 63.2% | 57.2% | 55.1% | 52.6% | 36.8% | 56.2% | 37.5% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 3/4 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 65.4% | 61.0% | 39.6% | 34.8% | 50.0% | 53.6% | 35.7% |
| 27 | 2005 | 3/13 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 65.7% | 52.1% | 48.2% | 55.9% | 41.7% | 50.6% | 36.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2006 | 12/16 | 0.6 | 4.2 | 64.7% | 58.3% | 44.3% | 43.8% | 43.2% | 53.3% | 41.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 38/42 | 1.0 | 5.3 | 65.8% | 62.7% | 42.6% | 55.8% | 49.7% | 55.8% | 45.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 4/7 | 0.5 | 4.3 | 71.0% | 55.8% | 43.7% | 52.5% | 59.4% | 52.2% | 39.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 58/266 | 0.9 | 4.9 | 65.9% | 60.6% | 43.3% | 52.8% | 48.2% | 54.7% | 43.9% | — | 14/92 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 63.2% | 58.7% | 43.8% | 50.2% | 38.0% | 53.2% | 36.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Meilen Tu | María Emilia Salerni | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 1994 | 1543 | 126.0 | — | — | — | — | +32 | — | — | 45.5% | -0.36 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 1506 | 118.5 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | +85 | 33.3% | -0.47 | 0–6 (0%) | 0–5 (0%) | 91.1 | -0.04 | 2000 | 1504 | 109.8 | — | — | — | — | +39 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.62 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | 0.00 |
| 18 | 1996 | 1518 | 108.5 | — | — | — | — | +9 | — | — | 36.4% | -0.64 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.25 | 2001 | 1509 | 116.0 | — | — | — | — | +5 | +40 | — | 40.0% | -0.33 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–2 | — | -0.01 |
| 19 | 1997 | 1520 | 114.3 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | — | 37.0% | -1.07 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–0 | — | -0.01 | 2002 | 1486 | 112.7 | — | — | — | — | -18 | +71 | — | 38.5% | -0.65 | 0–4 (0%) | 3–1 (75%) | 97.6 | -0.30 |
| 20 | 1998 | 1533 | 111.4 | — | — | — | — | +25 | — | — | 46.2% | -0.61 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | -0.08 | 2003 | 1431 | 92.2 | -0.98 | -1.47 | 0.654 | 41.2% | — | +38 | — | 14.3% | -2.79 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.15 |
| 21 | 1999 | 1485 | 108.0 | — | — | — | — | +29 | -18 | — | 28.1% | -1.50 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–1 | — | -0.21 | 2004 | 1541 | 120.5 | — | — | — | — | +13 | — | — | 69.6% | +1.35 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–3 (50%) | 100.3 | +0.32 |
| 22 | 2000 | 1576 | 129.8 | — | — | — | — | -11 | -88 | — | 35.5% | -0.87 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–0 | — | -1.26 | 2005 | 1452 | 102.3 | -1.73 | -1.65 | 0.651 | 40.5% | +23 | — | — | 21.1% | -2.00 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–3 (40%) | 99.3 | -0.22 |
| 23 | 2001 | 1615 | 124.8 | — | — | — | — | +19 | -100 | -43 | 50.4% | +0.09 | 15–12 (56%) | 6–13 (32%) | 98.8 | +2.97 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 1562 | 120.2 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -52 | +23 | 41.5% | -0.83 | 2–6 (25%) | 8–3 (73%) | 98.2 | +0.86 | 2007 | 1500 | 104.9 | -0.84 | -2.03 | 0.853 | 47.0% | -41 | +12 | — | 53.8% | +0.15 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | 99.8 | +0.42 |
| 25 | 2003 | 1478 | 102.5 | -0.75 | +0.07 | 0.979 | 49.4% | +37 | -53 | — | 27.9% | -1.28 | 3–4 (43%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.08 | 2008 | 1469 | 98.0 | +0.27 | -2.66 | 0.855 | 47.3% | — | +26 | — | 32.1% | -1.14 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–0 | — | +0.75 |
| 26 | 2004 | 1464 | 95.0 | — | — | — | — | +44 | — | — | 30.8% | -1.77 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.51 | 2009 | 1452 | 99.7 | -2.16 | -2.18 | 0.770 | 44.1% | — | +32 | — | 40.0% | -1.50 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.29 |
| 27 | 2005 | 1473 | 93.5 | -1.15 | -2.22 | 0.738 | 43.7% | +25 | — | +71 | 35.7% | -1.64 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | 101.9 | -0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2006 | 1532 | 114.0 | -1.42 | -1.20 | 0.896 | 47.6% | -68 | — | +139 | 44.4% | -0.92 | 2–2 (50%) | 4–0 (100%) | 103.6 | +0.38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 1627 | 128.6 | +0.38 | +1.07 | 1.029 | 50.8% | -79 | -65 | +74 | 48.4% | -0.01 | 6–5 (55%) | 5–4 (56%) | 104.1 | -0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 1548 | 100.4 | -1.42 | -2.70 | 0.835 | 46.2% | -63 | — | — | 23.5% | -1.47 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | +0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1693 | 123.2 | -0.22 | +0.15 | 0.969 | 49.4% | 0 | -69 | +60 | 40.9% | -0.65 | 40–51 (44%) | 34–31 (52%) | 102.6 | +1.17 | — | 1556 | 111.1 | -0.86 | -2.19 | 0.787 | 45.1% | +9 | +35 | — | 38.5% | -0.76 | 11–20 (35%) | 10–12 (45%) | 95.4 | +1.20 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amy Frazier | 2 | 4 | 6 | Apr 12, 2006 | H2H |
| Meghann Shaughnessy | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jul 26, 2007 | H2H |
| Shahar Peer | 0 | 4 | 4 | Aug 29, 2007 | H2H |
| Venus Williams | 0 | 4 | 4 | Apr 6, 2007 | H2H |
| Tatiana Poutchek | 3 | 1 | 4 | Mar 6, 2007 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 9, 2008 | H2H |
| Klara Koukalova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Mar 14, 2008 | H2H |
| Nuria Llagostera Vives | 1 | 1 | 2 | Feb 24, 2008 | H2H |
| Maria Elena Camerin | 2 | 0 | 2 | Feb 22, 2008 | H2H |
| Shuai Peng | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 27, 2007 | H2H |