H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Meilen Tu vs Marissa Irvin H2H: 2-2

Meilen Tu and Marissa Irvin are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marissa Irvin leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Meilen Tu leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marissa Irvin won the 2004 Vancouver round of 32 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Meilen Tu
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Marissa Irvin
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marissa Irvin #84 6-1 6-1 Meilen Tu #152 Match data Aug 12, 2004* R32 Vancouver Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Meilen Tu #58 7-6(0) 6-2 Marissa Irvin #60 Match data Jun 26, 2002* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Marissa Irvin #93 6-1 6-7(5) 6-0 Meilen Tu #46 Match data Sep 15, 2001* QF Waikoloa Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Meilen Tu #45 6-2 6-3 Marissa Irvin #128 Match data Apr 11, 2001* R64 Amelia Island Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Meilen Tu #1,136 #35 769 1,692 103 163 38.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Marissa Irvin #854 #51 652 1,603 37 80 31.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Meilen Tu Marissa Irvin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1994 2–3 40.0% #160 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1995 3–10 23.1% #161 1,506 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1996 2–3 40.0% #157 1,518 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #412 1,495 0 0
19 1997 6–13 31.6% #81 1,520 0 0 1999 0–2 0.0% #131 1,487 0 0
20 1998 2–3 40.0% #209 1,533 0 0 2000 4–7 36.4% #88 1,505 0 0
21 1999 3–11 21.4% #103 1,484 0 0 2001 8–14 36.4% #64 1,571 0 0
22 2000 6–9 40.0% #67 1,576 0 0 2002 9–18 33.3% #77 1,572 0 0
23 2001 25–23 52.1% #45 1,615 0 1 2003 3–11 21.4% #141 1,502 0 0
24 2002 16–24 40.0% #73 1,561 0 1 2004 7–13 35.0% #72 1,499 0 0
25 2003 4–14 22.2% #143 1,478 0 1 2005 6–14 30.0% #128 1,505 0 0
26 2004 2–4 33.3% #162 1,464 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2005 4–9 30.8% #120 1,473 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2006 7–9 43.8% #90 1,532 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2007 20–22 47.6% #47 1,626 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2008 1–6 14.3% #630 1,548 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Meilen Tu Marissa Irvin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1995 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1998 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 8 11 19 42.1% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2003 1 8 9 11.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2002 7 13 20 35.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2004 5 10 15 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2003 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 2 8 10 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2004 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 60 96 156 38.5% 18 37 55 32.7% 17 17 34 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1% — 26 52 78 33.3% 10 17 27 37.0% 1 8 9 11.1% 0 3 3 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Meilen Tu Marissa Irvin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1994 1543 126.0 — — — — +32 — — 45.5% -0.36 0–1 1–0 — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1995 1506 118.5 — — — — +10 — +85 33.3% -0.47 0–6 (0%) 0–5 (0%) 91.1 -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 1518 108.5 — — — — +9 — — 36.4% -0.64 1–0 — — +0.25 1998 1496 101.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.04
19 1997 1520 114.3 — — — — +34 — — 37.0% -1.07 3–5 (38%) 2–0 — -0.01 1999 1487 102.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.30
20 1998 1533 111.4 — — — — +25 — — 46.2% -0.61 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.08 2000 1505 117.5 — — — — +18 — — 39.3% -0.64 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.1 0.00
21 1999 1485 108.0 — — — — +29 -18 — 28.1% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.21 2001 1572 122.9 — — — — -1 -33 — 38.9% -0.74 5–5 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 103.9 -1.30
22 2000 1576 129.8 — — — — -11 -88 — 35.5% -0.87 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -1.26 2002 1572 129.6 — — — — +40 -62 — 37.1% -0.89 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) 99.1 -1.41
23 2001 1615 124.8 — — — — +19 -100 -43 50.4% +0.09 15–12 (56%) 6–13 (32%) 98.8 +2.97 2003 1503 104.4 — — — — +12 +35 — 30.3% -1.57 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 95.8 +0.46
24 2002 1562 120.2 — — — — +9 -52 +23 41.5% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 8–3 (73%) 98.2 +0.86 2004 1500 126.9 — — — — -10 +82 — 38.6% -0.23 1–5 (17%) 3–8 (27%) 93.1 +0.59
25 2003 1478 102.5 -0.75 +0.07 0.979 49.4% +37 -53 — 27.9% -1.28 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.08 2005 1506 112.6 — — — — -46 +67 — 36.2% -1.38 2–5 (29%) 3–1 (75%) 100.0 -0.56
26 2004 1464 95.0 — — — — +44 — — 30.8% -1.77 1–0 1–0 — +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 1473 93.5 -1.15 -2.22 0.738 43.7% +25 — +71 35.7% -1.64 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.9 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2006 1532 114.0 -1.42 -1.20 0.896 47.6% -68 — +139 44.4% -0.92 2–2 (50%) 4–0 (100%) 103.6 +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 1627 128.6 +0.38 +1.07 1.029 50.8% -79 -65 +74 48.4% -0.01 6–5 (55%) 5–4 (56%) 104.1 -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 1548 100.4 -1.42 -2.70 0.835 46.2% -63 — — 23.5% -1.47 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1693 123.2 -0.22 +0.15 0.969 49.4% 0 -69 +60 40.9% -0.65 40–51 (44%) 34–31 (52%) 102.6 +1.17 — 1604 125.7 — — — — +5 +17 — 36.4% -0.97 15–30 (33%) 16–17 (48%) 97.1 -2.19

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.