H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Meilen Tu vs Maureen Drake H2H: 2-0

Meilen Tu holds a 2–0 lead over Maureen Drake in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Meilen Tu leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Meilen Tu won the 2002 Waikoloa round of 32 7-6(6) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Meilen Tu
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Maureen Drake
CAN Age 55 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Meilen Tu #52 7-6(6) 6-3 Maureen Drake #102 Match data Sep 13, 2002* R32 Waikoloa Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Meilen Tu #40 7-5 2-6 6-3 Maureen Drake #202 Match data Jun 13, 2001* R64 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Meilen Tu #1,136 #35 769 1,692 103 163 38.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Maureen Drake #1,132 #47 612 1,586 40 93 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Meilen Tu Maureen Drake
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1994 2–3 40.0% #160 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1995 3–10 23.1% #161 1,506 0 0 1988 2–4 33.3% #275 1,497 0 0
18 1996 2–3 40.0% #157 1,518 0 0 1989 3–5 37.5% #163 1,505 0 0
19 1997 6–13 31.6% #81 1,520 0 0 1990 1–5 16.7% #209 1,463 0 0
20 1998 2–3 40.0% #209 1,533 0 0 1991 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 0
21 1999 3–11 21.4% #103 1,484 0 0 1992 0–5 0.0% #188 1,412 0 0
22 2000 6–9 40.0% #67 1,576 0 0 1993 3–10 23.1% #171 1,416 0 0
23 2001 25–23 52.1% #45 1,615 0 1 1994 1–3 25.0% #170 1,411 0 0
24 2002 16–24 40.0% #73 1,561 0 1 1995 2–2 50.0% #165 1,455 0 0
25 2003 4–14 22.2% #143 1,478 0 1 1996 1–5 16.7% #173 1,432 0 0
26 2004 2–4 33.3% #162 1,464 0 1 1997 0–1 0.0% #159 1,423 0 0
27 2005 4–9 30.8% #120 1,473 0 1 1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,412 0 0
28 2006 7–9 43.8% #90 1,532 0 1 1999 12–15 44.4% #57 1,554 0 0
29 2007 20–22 47.6% #47 1,626 0 1 2000 5–12 29.4% #147 1,503 0 0
30 2008 1–6 14.3% #630 1,548 0 1 2001 1–3 25.0% #161 1,493 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2002 4–6 40.0% #99 1,519 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2003 3–8 27.3% #115 1,500 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2004 0–4 0.0% #191 1,460 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #278 1,466 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Meilen Tu Maureen Drake
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1995 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1997 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1998 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2002 7 13 20 35.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2003 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2004 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2007 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2008 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 60 96 156 38.5% 18 37 55 32.7% 17 17 34 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1% — 23 57 80 28.8% 8 18 26 30.8% 5 11 16 31.2% 4 7 11 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Meilen Tu Maureen Drake
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1994 1543 126.0 — — — — +32 — — 45.5% -0.36 0–1 1–0 — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1995 1506 118.5 — — — — +10 — +85 33.3% -0.47 0–6 (0%) 0–5 (0%) 91.1 -0.04 1988 1498 102.4 — — — — +27 — — 35.7% -1.07 1–1 0–1 — -0.20
18 1996 1518 108.5 — — — — +9 — — 36.4% -0.64 1–0 — — +0.25 1989 1505 108.3 — — — — +37 — — 38.9% -0.78 1–1 1–1 — +0.46
19 1997 1520 114.3 — — — — +34 — — 37.0% -1.07 3–5 (38%) 2–0 — -0.01 1990 1464 106.0 — — — — +29 — — 26.7% -1.87 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.61
20 1998 1533 111.4 — — — — +25 — — 46.2% -0.61 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.08 1991 1451 96.1 — — — — +36 — — 30.0% -1.80 1–1 — — +0.35
21 1999 1485 108.0 — — — — +29 -18 — 28.1% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.21 1992 1413 99.9 — — — — +25 — — 16.7% -2.25 0–2 — — +0.07
22 2000 1576 129.8 — — — — -11 -88 — 35.5% -0.87 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -1.26 1993 1416 110.2 — — — — +28 — — 30.0% -1.30 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.21
23 2001 1615 124.8 — — — — +19 -100 -43 50.4% +0.09 15–12 (56%) 6–13 (32%) 98.8 +2.97 1994 1412 100.5 — — — — +30 — — 30.0% -1.10 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
24 2002 1562 120.2 — — — — +9 -52 +23 41.5% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 8–3 (73%) 98.2 +0.86 1995 1455 122.0 — — — — +21 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–2 — -0.19
25 2003 1478 102.5 -0.75 +0.07 0.979 49.4% +37 -53 — 27.9% -1.28 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.08 1996 1433 102.9 — — — — +40 — — 21.4% -1.71 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.04
26 2004 1464 95.0 — — — — +44 — — 30.8% -1.77 1–0 1–0 — +0.51 1997 1424 99.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.01
27 2005 1473 93.5 -1.15 -2.22 0.738 43.7% +25 — +71 35.7% -1.64 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.9 -0.07 1998 1413 103.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.01
28 2006 1532 114.0 -1.42 -1.20 0.896 47.6% -68 — +139 44.4% -0.92 2–2 (50%) 4–0 (100%) 103.6 +0.38 1999 1555 130.6 — — — — +12 -37 -32 45.0% -0.32 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 102.7 +0.23
29 2007 1627 128.6 +0.38 +1.07 1.029 50.8% -79 -65 +74 48.4% -0.01 6–5 (55%) 5–4 (56%) 104.1 -0.11 2000 1503 118.0 — — — — +70 -25 — 34.2% -0.97 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.30
30 2008 1548 100.4 -1.42 -2.70 0.835 46.2% -63 — — 23.5% -1.47 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.20 2001 1494 98.3 — — — — — — -13 33.3% -0.89 0–1 0–1 — +0.11
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1519 116.5 — — — — +20 — -7 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 95.6 +0.14
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1501 105.5 -0.96 -1.21 0.910 48.8% -7 -23 — 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.8 +0.08
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1461 95.4 -2.78 -1.48 0.811 45.3% -19 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 — — +0.03
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1467 97.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.11
Career — 1693 123.2 -0.22 +0.15 0.969 49.4% 0 -69 +60 40.9% -0.65 40–51 (44%) 34–31 (52%) 102.6 +1.17 — 1586 118.4 -1.69 -1.32 0.868 47.4% +26 -30 -16 35.1% -1.00 14–30 (32%) 10–24 (29%) 89.2 +1.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.