H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Meilen Tu vs Meredith Mcgrath H2H: 1-1

Meilen Tu and Meredith Mcgrath are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Meredith Mcgrath leads 1–0 on carpet, while Meilen Tu leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Meilen Tu won the 1995 Birmingham round of 32 7-5 1-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Meilen Tu
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Meredith Mcgrath
USA Age 55

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Meilen Tu #142 7-5 1-0 (ret.) Meredith Mcgrath #48 Match data Jun 15, 1995* R32 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Meredith Mcgrath #35 6-3 6-4 Meilen Tu #636 Match data Nov 3, 1994* R32 Oakland Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Meilen Tu #1,136 #35 769 1,692 103 163 38.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Meredith Mcgrath #315 #18 898 1,927 90 84 51.7% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Meilen Tu Meredith Mcgrath
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1994 2–3 40.0% #160 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1995 3–10 23.1% #161 1,506 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #400 1,497 0 0
18 1996 2–3 40.0% #157 1,518 0 0 1989 6–10 37.5% #93 1,516 0 0
19 1997 6–13 31.6% #81 1,520 0 0 1990 15–12 55.6% #28 1,708 0 0
20 1998 2–3 40.0% #209 1,533 0 0 1991 4–6 40.0% #164 1,679 0 0
21 1999 3–11 21.4% #103 1,484 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #780 1,657 0 0
22 2000 6–9 40.0% #67 1,576 0 0 1993 12–12 50.0% #66 1,707 0 0
23 2001 25–23 52.1% #45 1,615 0 1 1994 22–16 57.9% #39 1,767 0 2
24 2002 16–24 40.0% #73 1,561 0 1 1995 11–15 42.3% #62 1,742 0 2
25 2003 4–14 22.2% #143 1,478 0 1 1996 19–9 67.9% #26 1,917 0 3
26 2004 2–4 33.3% #162 1,464 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2005 4–9 30.8% #120 1,473 0 1 1998 1–2 33.3% #318 1,895 0 3
28 2006 7–9 43.8% #90 1,532 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2007 20–22 47.6% #47 1,626 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2008 1–6 14.3% #630 1,548 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Meilen Tu Meredith Mcgrath
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1995 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
19 1997 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 3 1 4 75.0%
20 1998 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1994 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
24 2002 7 13 20 35.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1995 2 7 9 22.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
25 2003 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2004 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 60 96 156 38.5% 18 37 55 32.7% 17 17 34 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1% — 36 43 79 45.6% 8 11 19 42.1% 29 15 44 65.9% 17 15 32 53.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Meilen Tu Meredith Mcgrath
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1994 1543 126.0 — — — — +32 — — 45.5% -0.36 0–1 1–0 — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1995 1506 118.5 — — — — +10 — +85 33.3% -0.47 0–6 (0%) 0–5 (0%) 91.1 -0.04 1988 1497 107.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.10
18 1996 1518 108.5 — — — — +9 — — 36.4% -0.64 1–0 — — +0.25 1989 1517 113.0 — — — — +50 — +23 34.4% -0.91 1–1 0–1 — +0.67
19 1997 1520 114.3 — — — — +34 — — 37.0% -1.07 3–5 (38%) 2–0 — -0.01 1990 1709 138.3 — — — — +2 — -93 54.1% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 104.9 -0.50
20 1998 1533 111.4 — — — — +25 — — 46.2% -0.61 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.08 1991 1679 124.7 — — — — +46 — — 44.0% -0.44 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +0.42
21 1999 1485 108.0 — — — — +29 -18 — 28.1% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.21 1992 1658 94.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.08
22 2000 1576 129.8 — — — — -11 -88 — 35.5% -0.87 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -1.26 1993 1708 131.5 — — — — -20 — -17 49.1% +0.04 5–4 (56%) 2–6 (25%) 100.0 -0.63
23 2001 1615 124.8 — — — — +19 -100 -43 50.4% +0.09 15–12 (56%) 6–13 (32%) 98.8 +2.97 1994 1768 146.2 — — — — -39 -242 +61 52.9% +0.14 8–3 (73%) 4–3 (57%) 110.7 -2.14
24 2002 1562 120.2 — — — — +9 -52 +23 41.5% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 8–3 (73%) 98.2 +0.86 1995 1742 142.5 — — — — +5 -174 — 49.1% +0.21 1–6 (14%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.72
25 2003 1478 102.5 -0.75 +0.07 0.979 49.4% +37 -53 — 27.9% -1.28 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.08 1996 1917 143.6 — — — — -150 -312 +118 63.9% +0.89 6–1 (86%) 1–2 (33%) 105.3 -1.70
26 2004 1464 95.0 — — — — +44 — — 30.8% -1.77 1–0 1–0 — +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 1473 93.5 -1.15 -2.22 0.738 43.7% +25 — +71 35.7% -1.64 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.9 -0.07 1998 1895 99.5 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — +0.03
28 2006 1532 114.0 -1.42 -1.20 0.896 47.6% -68 — +139 44.4% -0.92 2–2 (50%) 4–0 (100%) 103.6 +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 1627 128.6 +0.38 +1.07 1.029 50.8% -79 -65 +74 48.4% -0.01 6–5 (55%) 5–4 (56%) 104.1 -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 1548 100.4 -1.42 -2.70 0.835 46.2% -63 — — 23.5% -1.47 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1693 123.2 -0.22 +0.15 0.969 49.4% 0 -69 +60 40.9% -0.65 40–51 (44%) 34–31 (52%) 102.6 +1.17 — 1928 144.8 — — — — -13 -243 +39 51.0% +0.12 28–22 (56%) 13–21 (38%) 105.1 -2.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.