H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Meilen Tu vs Mi-Ra Jeon H2H: 0-1
Mi-Ra Jeon holds a 1–0 lead over Meilen Tu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mi-Ra Jeon leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mi-Ra Jeon won the 1995 Beijing third round 2-6 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 48
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 1995* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Mi-Ra Jeon | 2-6 6-4 7-6 | Meilen Tu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meilen Tu | #1,136 | #35 | 769 | 1,692 | 103 | 163 | 38.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mi-Ra Jeon | #855 | #129 | 264 | 1,515 | 4 | 14 | 22.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Meilen Tu | Mi-Ra Jeon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #160 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #161 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #216 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #81 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #209 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #103 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #135 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #67 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #45 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,478 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,464 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #47 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #630 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |