H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Meilen Tu vs Rachel Mcquillan H2H: 1-1

Meilen Tu and Rachel Mcquillan are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Meilen Tu won the 2001 Toyota Princess Cup round of 32 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Meilen Tu
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Rachel Mcquillan
AUS Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Meilen Tu #44 6-2 6-2 Rachel Mcquillan #63 Match data Sep 20, 2001* R32 Toyota Princess Cup Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Rachel Mcquillan #89 7-5 6-1 Meilen Tu #157 Match data Mar 8, 1995* R64 Delray Beach Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Meilen Tu #1,136 #35 769 1,692 103 163 38.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Rachel Mcquillan #971 #28 582 1,826 163 197 45.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Meilen Tu Rachel Mcquillan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1994 2–3 40.0% #160 1,542 0 0 1988 3–4 42.9% #159 1,525 0 0
17 1995 3–10 23.1% #161 1,506 0 0 1989 13–15 46.4% #79 1,628 0 0
18 1996 2–3 40.0% #157 1,518 0 0 1990 27–21 56.2% #39 1,710 0 0
19 1997 6–13 31.6% #81 1,520 0 0 1991 26–20 56.5% #36 1,744 0 0
20 1998 2–3 40.0% #209 1,533 0 0 1992 18–14 56.2% #38 1,742 0 0
21 1999 3–11 21.4% #103 1,484 0 0 1993 13–23 36.1% #115 1,571 0 0
22 2000 6–9 40.0% #67 1,576 0 0 1994 20–17 54.1% #61 1,649 0 0
23 2001 25–23 52.1% #45 1,615 0 1 1995 13–16 44.8% #69 1,667 0 0
24 2002 16–24 40.0% #73 1,561 0 1 1996 2–10 16.7% #186 1,563 0 0
25 2003 4–14 22.2% #143 1,478 0 1 1997 10–10 50.0% #48 1,645 0 0
26 2004 2–4 33.3% #162 1,464 0 1 1998 3–15 16.7% #185 1,528 0 0
27 2005 4–9 30.8% #120 1,473 0 1 1999 1–3 25.0% #160 1,520 0 0
28 2006 7–9 43.8% #90 1,532 0 1 2000 0–4 0.0% #107 1,463 0 0
29 2007 20–22 47.6% #47 1,626 0 1 2001 12–17 41.4% #79 1,524 0 0
30 2008 1–6 14.3% #630 1,548 0 1 2002 2–7 22.2% #178 1,473 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #355 1,464 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Meilen Tu Rachel Mcquillan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
17 1995 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 3 8 11 27.3% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
18 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 10 5 15 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
19 1997 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 9 6 15 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 1998 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 9 5 14 64.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 9 14 23 39.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 17 13 30 56.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1995 11 10 21 52.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 2002 7 13 20 35.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1996 2 7 9 22.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2003 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 9 5 14 64.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2004 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 1 9 10 10.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1999 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2007 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2001 9 10 19 47.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2008 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 60 96 156 38.5% 18 37 55 32.7% 17 17 34 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1% — 94 108 202 46.5% 41 46 87 47.1% 12 25 37 32.4% 16 18 34 47.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Meilen Tu Rachel Mcquillan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1994 1543 126.0 — — — — +32 — — 45.5% -0.36 0–1 1–0 — -0.21 1988 1525 105.3 — — — — +33 — +35 40.0% -1.00 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.46
17 1995 1506 118.5 — — — — +10 — +85 33.3% -0.47 0–6 (0%) 0–5 (0%) 91.1 -0.04 1989 1628 133.6 — — — — -84 +68 — 52.3% +0.29 3–8 (27%) 5–7 (42%) 96.2 -0.04
18 1996 1518 108.5 — — — — +9 — — 36.4% -0.64 1–0 — — +0.25 1990 1710 138.1 — — — — -54 +68 -125 55.5% +0.15 7–7 (50%) 11–3 (79%) 108.8 -1.35
19 1997 1520 114.3 — — — — +34 — — 37.0% -1.07 3–5 (38%) 2–0 — -0.01 1991 1745 143.2 — — — — -36 +98 -162 56.1% +0.50 7–8 (47%) 10–7 (59%) 102.3 -1.03
20 1998 1533 111.4 — — — — +25 — — 46.2% -0.61 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.08 1992 1743 134.0 — — — — +48 +31 — 57.7% +0.24 4–5 (44%) 5–2 (71%) 101.4 +0.56
21 1999 1485 108.0 — — — — +29 -18 — 28.1% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.21 1993 1571 123.4 — — — — +47 +137 +1 43.7% -0.23 3–12 (20%) 0–5 (0%) — 0.00
22 2000 1576 129.8 — — — — -11 -88 — 35.5% -0.87 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -1.26 1994 1650 132.0 — — — — +20 — -38 51.7% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.6 -0.52
23 2001 1615 124.8 — — — — +19 -100 -43 50.4% +0.09 15–12 (56%) 6–13 (32%) 98.8 +2.97 1995 1668 136.0 — — — — +64 -22 -89 46.9% -0.33 2–6 (25%) 4–0 (100%) 99.7 -0.84
24 2002 1562 120.2 — — — — +9 -52 +23 41.5% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 8–3 (73%) 98.2 +0.86 1996 1564 118.6 — — — — +94 — — 25.9% -1.26 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 96.5 -0.32
25 2003 1478 102.5 -0.75 +0.07 0.979 49.4% +37 -53 — 27.9% -1.28 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.08 1997 1646 124.9 — — — — +88 -103 -51 46.8% -0.11 5–2 (71%) 0–6 (0%) 99.4 +0.04
26 2004 1464 95.0 — — — — +44 — — 30.8% -1.77 1–0 1–0 — +0.51 1998 1528 122.7 — — — — +87 -7 — 29.5% -0.93 1–7 (13%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.66
27 2005 1473 93.5 -1.15 -2.22 0.738 43.7% +25 — +71 35.7% -1.64 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.9 -0.07 1999 1521 111.6 — — — — +78 — — 30.0% -1.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.09
28 2006 1532 114.0 -1.42 -1.20 0.896 47.6% -68 — +139 44.4% -0.92 2–2 (50%) 4–0 (100%) 103.6 +0.38 2000 1464 94.4 — — — — +80 — — 27.3% -1.09 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.36
29 2007 1627 128.6 +0.38 +1.07 1.029 50.8% -79 -65 +74 48.4% -0.01 6–5 (55%) 5–4 (56%) 104.1 -0.11 2001 1524 120.3 — — — — +71 -27 -53 43.5% -0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.9 +1.07
30 2008 1548 100.4 -1.42 -2.70 0.835 46.2% -63 — — 23.5% -1.47 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.20 2002 1474 99.4 — — — — +43 — — 25.0% -1.40 1–1 1–0 — +0.25
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1464 100.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.03
Career — 1693 123.2 -0.22 +0.15 0.969 49.4% 0 -69 +60 40.9% -0.65 40–51 (44%) 34–31 (52%) 102.6 +1.17 — 1826 136.8 — — — — +27 +53 -57 47.7% -0.13 47–72 (39%) 45–44 (51%) 97.6 -0.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.