H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Meilen Tu vs Rachel Mcquillan H2H: 1-1
Meilen Tu and Rachel Mcquillan are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Meilen Tu won the 2001 Tokyo third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 48
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2001* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Meilen Tu | 6-2 6-2 | Rachel Mcquillan | Match data |
| Mar 8, 1995* | Delray Beach | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Rachel Mcquillan | 7-5 6-1 | Meilen Tu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meilen Tu | #1,136 | #35 | 769 | 1,692 | 103 | 163 | 38.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Rachel Mcquillan | #971 | #28 | 582 | 1,826 | 163 | 195 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Meilen Tu | Rachel Mcquillan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #160 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #159 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1995 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #161 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #79 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #39 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #81 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #209 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #103 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #115 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #67 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #61 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #45 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #186 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,478 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,464 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #185 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #47 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #79 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #630 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #178 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #355 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |