Meilen Tu
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amy Frazier | 2 | 4 | 6 | Apr 12, 2006 | H2H |
| Meghann Shaughnessy | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jul 26, 2007 | H2H |
| Shahar Peer | 0 | 4 | 4 | Aug 29, 2007 | H2H |
| Venus Williams | 0 | 4 | 4 | Apr 6, 2007 | H2H |
| Tatiana Poutchek | 3 | 1 | 4 | Mar 6, 2007 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Meilen Tu vs Vanessa Henke H2H: 0-1
Vanessa Henke holds a 1–0 lead over Meilen Tu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vanessa Henke leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vanessa Henke won the 2005 Portoroz quarterfinal 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 45
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanessa Henke | 6-2 6-0 | Meilen Tu | Match data | Sep 24, 2005* | QF | Portoroz | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meilen Tu | #1,136 | #35 | 769 | 1,692 | 103 | 163 | 38.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Vanessa Henke | — | — | — | 1,547 | 5 | 9 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Meilen Tu | Vanessa Henke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #160 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #161 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #81 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #209 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #103 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #67 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #45 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,478 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,464 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,473 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2006 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #47 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #630 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Meilen Tu | Vanessa Henke | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1994 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 1998 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2001 | 16 | 13 | 29 | 55.2% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2004 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2005 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2003 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2006 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2004 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2006 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 45.8% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 60 | 96 | 156 | 38.5% | 18 | 37 | 55 | 32.7% | 17 | 17 | 34 | 50.0% | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | — | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 58/96 of Meilen Tu's and 1/1 of Vanessa Henke's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Meilen Tu | Vanessa Henke | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 25 | 2003 | 1/18 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 63.2% | 53.5% | 44.0% | 36.4% | 28.6% | 50.0% | 48.9% | 2006 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 67.2% | 56.1% | 45.0% | 42.9% | 33.3% | 52.5% | 35.1% |
| 27 | 2005 | 3/13 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 65.7% | 52.1% | 48.2% | 55.9% | 41.7% | 50.6% | 36.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2006 | 12/16 | 0.6 | 4.2 | 64.7% | 58.3% | 44.3% | 43.8% | 43.2% | 53.3% | 41.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 38/42 | 1.0 | 5.3 | 65.8% | 62.7% | 42.6% | 55.8% | 49.7% | 55.8% | 45.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 4/7 | 0.5 | 4.3 | 71.0% | 55.8% | 43.7% | 52.5% | 59.4% | 52.2% | 39.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 58/266 | 0.9 | 4.9 | 65.9% | 60.6% | 43.3% | 52.8% | 48.2% | 54.7% | 43.9% | — | 1/14 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 67.2% | 56.1% | 45.0% | 42.9% | 33.3% | 52.5% | 35.1% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Meilen Tu | Vanessa Henke | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 1994 | 1543 | 126.0 | — | — | — | — | +32 | — | — | 45.5% | -0.36 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 1506 | 118.5 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | +85 | 33.3% | -0.47 | 0–6 (0%) | 0–5 (0%) | — | -0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 1518 | 108.5 | — | — | — | — | +9 | — | — | 36.4% | -0.64 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 1520 | 114.3 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | — | 37.0% | -1.07 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–0 | — | -0.01 | 2000 | 1495 | 103.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.10 |
| 20 | 1998 | 1533 | 111.4 | — | — | — | — | +25 | — | — | 46.2% | -0.61 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | -0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 1485 | 108.0 | — | — | — | — | +29 | -18 | — | 28.1% | -1.50 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–1 | — | -0.21 | 2002 | 1484 | 107.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +48 | — | 25.0% | -1.38 | — | — | — | +0.08 |
| 22 | 2000 | 1576 | 129.8 | — | — | — | — | -11 | -88 | — | 35.5% | -0.87 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–0 | — | -1.26 | 2003 | 1477 | 97.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.05 |
| 23 | 2001 | 1615 | 124.8 | — | — | — | — | +19 | -100 | -43 | 50.4% | +0.09 | 15–12 (56%) | 6–13 (32%) | — | +2.97 | 2004 | 1492 | 105.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.40 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.16 |
| 24 | 2002 | 1562 | 120.2 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -52 | +23 | 41.5% | -0.83 | 2–6 (25%) | 8–3 (73%) | — | +0.86 | 2005 | 1537 | 113.3 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | — | 58.3% | +0.42 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.06 |
| 25 | 2003 | 1478 | 102.5 | -0.75 | +0.07 | 0.979 | 49.4% | +37 | -53 | — | 27.9% | -1.28 | 3–4 (43%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.08 | 2006 | 1525 | 99.9 | -3.17 | +0.49 | 0.738 | 44.1% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.01 |
| 26 | 2004 | 1464 | 95.0 | — | — | — | — | +44 | — | — | 30.8% | -1.77 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 1473 | 93.5 | -1.15 | -2.22 | 0.738 | 43.7% | +25 | — | +71 | 35.7% | -1.64 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2006 | 1532 | 114.0 | -1.42 | -1.20 | 0.896 | 47.6% | -68 | — | +139 | 44.4% | -0.92 | 2–2 (50%) | 4–0 (100%) | — | +0.38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 1627 | 128.6 | +0.38 | +1.07 | 1.029 | 50.8% | -79 | -65 | +74 | 48.4% | -0.01 | 6–5 (55%) | 5–4 (56%) | — | -0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 1548 | 100.4 | -1.42 | -2.70 | 0.835 | 46.2% | -63 | — | — | 23.5% | -1.47 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | +0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1693 | 123.2 | -0.22 | +0.15 | 0.969 | 49.4% | 0 | -69 | +60 | 40.9% | -0.65 | 40–51 (44%) | 34–31 (52%) | 102.6 | +1.17 | — | 1547 | 110.9 | -3.17 | +0.49 | 0.738 | 44.1% | +10 | +48 | — | 35.5% | -1.06 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–1 | — | -2.00 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Vanessa Henke
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meghann Shaughnessy | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 12, 2006 | H2H |
| Nicole Vaidisova | 0 | 1 | 1 | Nov 3, 2005 | H2H |
| Klara Koukalova | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 24, 2005 | H2H |
| Meilen Tu | 1 | 0 | 1 | Sep 24, 2005 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Bychkova | 1 | 0 | 1 | Sep 23, 2005 | H2H |