H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Melanie Oudin vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 1-2
Tamira Paszek holds a 2–1 lead over Melanie Oudin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Tamira Paszek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Melanie Oudin won the 2013 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melanie Oudin | 6-4 6-3 | Tamira Paszek | Match data | May 29, 2013* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay |
| Tamira Paszek | 7-6(2) 3-6 6-2 | Melanie Oudin | Match data | Jul 25, 2011 | Washington | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard |
| Tamira Paszek | 6-1 7-5 | Melanie Oudin | Match data | Apr 6, 2011* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melanie Oudin | #428 | #31 | 1,644 | 1,711 | 53 | 78 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tamira Paszek | #446 | #299 | 230 | 1,782 | 100 | 129 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Melanie Oudin | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 2008 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #178 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2009 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #48 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2010 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #61 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2011 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2012 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #84 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2013 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #128 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #157 | 1,483 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 3 |