H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Melinda Czink vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 0-1

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 1–0 lead over Melinda Czink in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 2010 Indian Wells first round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Melinda Czink
HUN Age 43 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 9, 2010* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R128 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-2 6-2 Melinda Czink #46 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Melinda Czink #691 #37 1,571 1,794 89 136 39.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Melinda Czink Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 2003 4–3 57.1% #79 1,568 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 2004 2–15 11.8% #128 1,427 0 0 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 2005 9–12 42.9% #96 1,478 0 0 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 2006 14–18 43.8% #105 1,500 0 0 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 2007 3–9 25.0% #124 1,456 0 0 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 2008 10–11 47.6% #106 1,558 0 0 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 2009 29–21 58.0% #37 1,741 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2010 3–16 15.8% #312 1,524 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2011 3–6 33.3% #143 1,519 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2012 9–16 36.0% #94 1,543 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2013 3–9 25.0% #254 1,499 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8