H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Mercedes Paz vs Angelika Kanellopoulou H2H: 1-1
Mercedes Paz and Angelika Kanellopoulou are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mercedes Paz leads 1–0 on clay, while Angelika Kanellopoulou leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Angelika Kanellopoulou won the 1985 Tokyo Japan Open fourth round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 1985* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Angelika Kanellopoulou | 6-0 6-4 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
| Mar 23, 1985* | Sao Paulo | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Mercedes Paz | 6-3 1-6 6-4 | Angelika Kanellopoulou | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes Paz | #521 | #28 | 185 | 1,822 | 144 | 182 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Angelika Kanellopoulou | — | — | — | 1,718 | 71 | 88 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mercedes Paz | Angelika Kanellopoulou | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #115 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 13–13 | 50.0% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #71 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 13–13 | 50.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #213 | 1,495 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,476 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,452 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #124 | 1,442 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |