H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mercedes Paz vs Isabel Cueto H2H: 2-2
Mercedes Paz and Isabel Cueto are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay. Most recently, Mercedes Paz won the 1990 Strasbourg quarterfinal 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 1990* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Mercedes Paz | 6-1 6-0 | Isabel Cueto | Match data |
| May 3, 1990* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Isabel Cueto | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
| Jul 15, 1989* | Archaron | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Mercedes Paz | 7-6 7-5 | Isabel Cueto | Match data |
| May 4, 1988* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Isabel Cueto | 6-3 7-6 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes Paz | #521 | #28 | 185 | 1,822 | 144 | 182 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Isabel Cueto | #256 | #20 | 45 | 1,885 | 130 | 101 | 56.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mercedes Paz | Isabel Cueto | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #29 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #115 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #31 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1986 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #28 | 1,817 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #117 | 1,662 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,590 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1990 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #71 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1993 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #213 | 1,495 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1994 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,476 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,452 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #124 | 1,442 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |