H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Mercedes Paz vs Noelle Van Lottum H2H: 2-0

Mercedes Paz holds a 2–0 lead over Noelle Van Lottum in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mercedes Paz leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Mercedes Paz won the 1992 Paris round of 32 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mercedes Paz
ARG Age 60 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Noelle Van Lottum
FRA Age 54

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mercedes Paz #66 6-2 6-3 Noelle Van Lottum Match data Sep 17, 1992* R32 Paris Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Mercedes Paz #79 6-3 6-4 Noelle Van Lottum Match data Jul 11, 1991* R32 Palermo Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mercedes Paz #521 #28 185 1,822 145 184 44.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Noelle Van Lottum — — — 1,646 56 96 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mercedes Paz Noelle Van Lottum
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1988 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1989 3–2 60.0% — 1,533 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1990 3–2 60.0% — 1,580 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 8–15 34.8% — 1,531 0 0
19 1985 7–11 38.9% #115 1,526 0 1 1992 17–20 45.9% — 1,610 0 1
20 1986 22–23 48.9% #60 1,577 0 1 1993 13–21 38.2% — 1,582 0 1
21 1987 15–20 42.9% #88 1,637 0 1 1994 7–12 36.8% — 1,575 0 1
22 1988 24–15 61.5% #44 1,779 0 2 1995 1–9 10.0% — 1,465 0 1
23 1989 13–19 40.6% #91 1,647 0 2 1996 0–2 0.0% — 1,441 0 1
24 1990 25–20 55.6% #32 1,775 0 3 1997 2–9 18.2% — 1,426 0 1
25 1991 19–23 45.2% #71 1,683 0 3 1998 1–2 33.3% — 1,428 0 1
26 1992 10–19 34.5% #107 1,606 0 3 1999 0–1 0.0% — 1,416 0 1
27 1993 2–11 15.4% #213 1,491 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 1994 3–10 23.1% #140 1,474 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1995 4–8 33.3% #164 1,451 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1996 1–5 16.7% #124 1,442 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mercedes Paz Noelle Van Lottum
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1985 2 4 6 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1986 8 10 18 44.4% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1987 4 4 8 50.0% 11 14 25 44.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1994 3 6 9 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1988 11 5 16 68.8% 13 10 23 56.5% — — — — — — — — 1995 1 5 6 16.7% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1989 0 6 6 0.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
25 1991 9 8 17 52.9% 9 11 20 45.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1998 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 1992 0 5 5 0.0% 10 12 22 45.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1993 2 5 7 28.6% 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 57 98 41.8% 93 98 191 48.7% 3 12 15 20.0% 8 17 25 32.0% — 25 41 66 37.9% 22 40 62 35.5% 0 8 8 0.0% 9 7 16 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mercedes Paz Noelle Van Lottum
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1507 102.1 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.60 0–1 — — +0.28
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1533 105.7 — — — — +43 — — 53.3% +0.07 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — +0.90
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1581 116.6 — — — — +44 — — 60.0% -0.10 — 1–0 — +0.14
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1532 111.1 — — — — +43 +16 — 38.8% -0.80 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.26
19 1985 1526 110.7 — — — — +40 +38 — 40.9% -0.66 4–4 (50%) 0–1 — +0.74 1992 1610 125.2 — — — — +39 -43 — 48.1% -0.30 3–4 (43%) 5–1 (83%) 101.6 +1.96
20 1986 1577 119.8 — — — — -30 +125 — 50.5% +0.08 7–10 (41%) 7–3 (70%) 100.7 +3.38 1993 1583 123.6 — — — — +35 -30 — 40.7% -0.57 6–9 (40%) 2–6 (25%) 96.9 +0.33
21 1987 1637 131.6 — — — — -16 +33 — 45.6% -0.18 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 97.5 -0.70 1994 1576 110.9 — — — — +14 +11 — 40.0% -1.15 4–2 (67%) — — -0.09
22 1988 1780 134.3 — — — — -56 -13 — 57.5% +0.52 7–2 (78%) 4–3 (57%) 106.9 +0.57 1995 1465 92.1 — — — — +55 +58 — 11.1% -3.06 0–2 2–0 — +0.63
23 1989 1648 125.8 — — — — -60 +126 — 45.9% -0.22 2–8 (20%) 8–7 (53%) 94.4 +0.43 1996 1442 96.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.80 0–1 — — +0.13
24 1990 1776 143.2 — — — — -121 +116 — 54.3% +0.15 8–9 (47%) 7–7 (50%) 101.6 -2.36 1997 1427 107.1 — — — — +69 +66 +36 26.9% -1.35 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.01
25 1991 1684 124.3 — — — — +2 +72 — 45.2% -0.53 5–6 (45%) 6–3 (67%) 102.6 +1.48 1998 1429 97.9 — — — — — +33 — 44.4% -0.78 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.19
26 1992 1606 128.7 — — — — -21 +95 — 42.6% -0.54 1–9 (10%) 2–1 (67%) 91.7 -1.41 1999 1416 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.09
27 1993 1491 102.6 — — — — +47 +87 — 24.1% -1.38 0–5 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 1474 115.3 — — — — +29 +93 — 22.2% -1.81 0–1 1–1 — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1452 102.8 — — — — +50 +58 — 36.0% -0.72 0–1 1–1 — +0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 1442 97.8 — — — — — +17 — 16.7% -2.67 — 0–1 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1822 131.0 — — — — -28 +76 — 45.9% -0.29 37–61 (38%) 38–33 (54%) 96.4 +1.19 — 1646 119.1 — — — — +39 -1 +36 40.7% -0.78 20–29 (41%) 12–11 (52%) 99.0 +3.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.