H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Mercedes Paz vs Noelle Van Lottum H2H: 2-0
Mercedes Paz holds a 2–0 lead over Noelle Van Lottum in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mercedes Paz leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Mercedes Paz won the 1992 Paris third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 54
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 1992* | Paris | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Mercedes Paz | 6-2 6-3 | Noelle Van Lottum | Match data |
| Jul 11, 1991* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Mercedes Paz | 6-3 6-4 | Noelle Van Lottum | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes Paz | #521 | #28 | 185 | 1,822 | 144 | 182 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Noelle Van Lottum | — | — | — | 1,659 | 56 | 96 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mercedes Paz | Noelle Van Lottum | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #115 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1986 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 1–9 | 10.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,427 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #71 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1993 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #213 | 1,495 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1994 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,476 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,452 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #124 | 1,442 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |