H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Mercedes Paz vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 2-2

Mercedes Paz and Sandra Cecchini are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay. Most recently, Mercedes Paz won the 1992 Strasbourg fourth round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mercedes Paz
ARG Age 60 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 22, 1992* Strasbourg WTA 500 R16 Clay Mercedes Paz #75 6-1 6-1 Sandra Cecchini #37 Match data
Jul 9, 1988* Bastad WTA 250 QF Clay Sandra Cecchini #18 6-3 6-3 Mercedes Paz #54 Match data
Apr 30, 1986* Indianapolis WTA 250 R32 Clay Mercedes Paz #112 4-6 7-5 6-1 Sandra Cecchini #36 Match data
Apr 25, 1985* Orlando WTA 250 R32 Clay Sandra Cecchini #58 4-6 7-6 6-2 Mercedes Paz #82 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mercedes Paz #521 #28 185 1,822 144 182 44.2% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mercedes Paz Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
19 1985 7–11 38.9% #115 1,526 0 1 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1986 22–23 48.9% #60 1,577 0 1 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1987 15–20 42.9% #88 1,637 0 1 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 1988 23–14 62.2% #44 1,779 0 2 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1989 13–19 40.6% #91 1,647 0 2 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 1990 25–20 55.6% #32 1,776 0 3 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1991 19–23 45.2% #71 1,684 0 3 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 1992 10–18 35.7% #107 1,614 0 3 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 1993 2–11 15.4% #213 1,495 0 3 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 1994 3–10 23.1% #140 1,476 0 3 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 1995 4–8 33.3% #164 1,452 0 3 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 1996 1–5 16.7% #124 1,442 0 3 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11