H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Meredith Mcgrath vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 1-1

Meredith Mcgrath and Sandra Cecchini are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Meredith Mcgrath leads 1–0 on carpet, while Sandra Cecchini leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sandra Cecchini won the 1996 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Meredith Mcgrath
USA Age 55
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 29, 1996* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Sandra Cecchini #127 6-2 6-1 Meredith Mcgrath #49 Match data
Oct 14, 1993* Montpellier WTA 250 R32 Carpet Meredith Mcgrath #72 6-1 6-4 Sandra Cecchini #44 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Meredith Mcgrath #315 #18 898 1,927 90 84 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Meredith Mcgrath Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1988 0–1 0.0% #400 1,497 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 1989 6–10 37.5% #93 1,517 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
19 1990 15–12 55.6% #28 1,708 0 0 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1991 4–6 40.0% #164 1,679 0 0 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1992 0–1 0.0% #780 1,657 0 0 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 1993 12–12 50.0% #66 1,707 0 0 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1994 22–16 57.9% #39 1,767 0 2 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 1995 11–15 42.3% #62 1,742 0 2 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1996 19–9 67.9% #26 1,917 0 3 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 — — — — — — — 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 1998 1–2 33.3% #318 1,874 0 3 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 — — — — — — — 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 — — — — — — — 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11