H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Michaella Krajicek vs Sanda Mamic H2H: 0-1
Sanda Mamic holds a 1–0 lead over Michaella Krajicek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sanda Mamic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sanda Mamic won the 2008 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 37
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2008* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Sanda Mamic | 6-4 6-3 | Michaella Krajicek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michaella Krajicek | #1,134 | #30 | 918 | 1,803 | 89 | 98 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Sanda Mamic | #1,100 | #83 | 437 | 1,587 | 14 | 23 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michaella Krajicek | Sanda Mamic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2005 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #63 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2006 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #35 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #33 | 1,671 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2008 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #203 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #128 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #171 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #145 | 1,505 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2011 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #93 | 1,589 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2012 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #167 | 1,562 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #282 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #273 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,549 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |