Michele Gurdal
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sue Barker | 0 | 4 | 4 | Dec 25, 1978 | H2H |
| Dianne Fromholtz | 0 | 4 | 4 | Dec 21, 1978 | H2H |
| Daniela Marzano | 1 | 3 | 4 | Apr 1, 1978 | H2H |
| Virginia Ruzici | 0 | 4 | 4 | Sep 2, 1977 | H2H |
| Helga Masthoff | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 26, 1977 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Michele Gurdal vs Cecilia Martinez H2H: 0-1
Cecilia Martinez holds a 1–0 lead over Michele Gurdal in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Cecilia Martinez leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Cecilia Martinez won the 1975 Christchurch round of 16 6-3 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cecilia Martinez | 6-3 2-6 6-3 | Michele Gurdal | Match data | Jan 17, 1975* | R16 | Christchurch | WTA 250 | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michele Gurdal | — | — | — | 1,715 | 90 | 135 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Cecilia Martinez | — | — | — | 1,713 | 121 | 157 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michele Gurdal | Cecilia Martinez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1970 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1972 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1973 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1974 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 26–18 | 59.1% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1975 | 18–24 | 42.9% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1976 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1977 | 3–11 | 21.4% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 12–25 | 32.4% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1978 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1979 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1980 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Michele Gurdal | Cecilia Martinez | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1970 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1972 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1973 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1974 | — | — | — | — | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1968 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 20 | 12 | 32 | 62.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 1975 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1969 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 23 | 1976 | — | — | — | — | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 6 | 13 | 19 | 31.6% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1977 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1971 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% |
| 25 | 1978 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1972 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 1979 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 1980 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% |
| 28 | 1981 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | 48 | 61 | 109 | 44.0% | 28 | 46 | 74 | 37.8% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | — | 20 | 27 | 47 | 42.6% | 17 | 42 | 59 | 28.8% | 63 | 56 | 119 | 52.9% | 11 | 25 | 36 | 30.6% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Michele Gurdal | Cecilia Martinez | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1970 | 1476 | 94.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | 41.7% | -0.67 | 1–1 | — | — | +1.60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 1491 | 100.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.00 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1972 | 1465 | 98.0 | — | — | — | — | +97 | +73 | -5 | 34.1% | -1.43 | 3–1 (75%) | 0–2 | — | +2.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1973 | 1551 | 123.8 | — | — | — | — | +12 | +55 | -111 | 40.8% | -0.65 | 4–7 (36%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | +1.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1974 | 1599 | 128.2 | — | — | — | — | — | -3 | -66 | 48.2% | +0.18 | 0–5 (0%) | 1–3 (25%) | 92.5 | +1.57 | 1968 | 1662 | 117.1 | — | — | — | — | -132 | — | +80 | 57.0% | +0.38 | 7–7 (50%) | — | — | -0.62 |
| 22 | 1975 | 1590 | 130.3 | — | — | — | — | -58 | +7 | +40 | 48.5% | -0.08 | 2–11 (15%) | 3–3 (50%) | 90.9 | +0.39 | 1969 | 1597 | 112.9 | — | — | — | — | +3 | -101 | +76 | 42.9% | -0.25 | 2–3 (40%) | — | — | -0.23 |
| 23 | 1976 | 1675 | 122.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +10 | -55 | 47.5% | -0.69 | 4–3 (57%) | 5–0 (100%) | 106.9 | -1.11 | 1970 | 1689 | 132.1 | — | — | — | — | +25 | -192 | +66 | 53.2% | +0.37 | 2–6 (25%) | 1–0 | — | +0.68 |
| 24 | 1977 | 1576 | 111.9 | — | — | — | — | — | +75 | -40 | 33.3% | -1.24 | 0–5 (0%) | 1–0 | — | +0.31 | 1971 | 1629 | 125.6 | — | — | — | — | -82 | -110 | +101 | 36.4% | -0.95 | 1–4 (20%) | 0–2 | — | +0.12 |
| 25 | 1978 | 1551 | 118.7 | — | — | — | — | -88 | +37 | +3 | 36.7% | -0.71 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–3 (25%) | 97.1 | +0.56 | 1972 | 1547 | 117.8 | — | — | — | — | -110 | -63 | +101 | 35.6% | -1.07 | 0–7 (0%) | 2–1 (67%) | 91.6 | +0.20 |
| 26 | 1979 | 1536 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +30 | 44.0% | -0.76 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | +1.54 | 1973 | 1548 | 125.4 | — | — | — | — | -123 | -66 | +104 | 35.4% | -0.81 | 3–5 (38%) | 1–2 (33%) | 98.5 | +0.09 |
| 27 | 1980 | 1516 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +5 | +35 | 40.0% | -0.85 | 0–2 | 0–2 | — | +0.29 | 1974 | 1653 | 130.1 | — | — | — | — | -120 | -179 | +26 | 51.6% | +0.43 | 9–6 (60%) | 2–8 (20%) | 99.6 | +1.28 |
| 28 | 1981 | 1511 | 103.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -3.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.11 | 1975 | 1586 | 116.7 | — | — | — | — | -18 | -125 | +131 | 47.6% | -0.27 | 3–6 (33%) | 1–3 (25%) | 94.9 | +1.45 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1562 | 114.1 | — | — | — | — | -35 | -100 | — | 33.3% | -1.08 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.09 |
| Career | — | 1715 | 122.8 | — | — | — | — | -4 | +24 | -20 | 43.0% | -0.55 | 18–39 (32%) | 15–14 (52%) | 92.2 | +4.17 | — | 1713 | 127.5 | — | — | — | — | -71 | -135 | +84 | 45.8% | -0.22 | 29–49 (37%) | 9–17 (35%) | 90.1 | +1.05 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Cecilia Martinez
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francoise Durr | 0 | 7 | 7 | Oct 11, 1974 | H2H |
| Margaret Court | 0 | 7 | 7 | Sep 4, 1973 | H2H |
| Betty Stove | 0 | 6 | 6 | Sep 15, 1976 | H2H |
| Peggy Michel | 3 | 3 | 6 | Dec 19, 1974 | H2H |
| Billie Jean King | 0 | 6 | 6 | Mar 21, 1974 | H2H |