Michele Gurdal
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sue Barker | 0 | 4 | 4 | Dec 25, 1978 | H2H |
| Dianne Fromholtz | 0 | 4 | 4 | Dec 21, 1978 | H2H |
| Daniela Marzano | 1 | 3 | 4 | Apr 1, 1978 | H2H |
| Virginia Ruzici | 0 | 4 | 4 | Sep 2, 1977 | H2H |
| Helga Masthoff | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 26, 1977 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Michele Gurdal vs Ching Ling Chang H2H: 1-0
Michele Gurdal holds a 1–0 lead over Ching Ling Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michele Gurdal leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Michele Gurdal won the 1974 Indianapolis round of 16 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michele Gurdal | 6-3 6-4 | Ching Ling Chang | Match data | Aug 9, 1974* | R16 | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michele Gurdal | — | — | — | 1,715 | 90 | 135 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ching Ling Chang | — | — | — | 1,500 | 13 | 41 | 24.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michele Gurdal | Ching Ling Chang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1970 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1972 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1973 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1974 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1975 | 18–24 | 42.9% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1976 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1977 | 3–11 | 21.4% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1978 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1979 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 8–16 | 33.3% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1980 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,411 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Michele Gurdal | Ching Ling Chang | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1970 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1972 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1973 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1974 | — | — | — | — | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1975 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1976 | — | — | — | — | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1977 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1972 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1978 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1973 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1979 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 1980 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 1981 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | 48 | 61 | 109 | 44.0% | 28 | 46 | 74 | 37.8% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | — | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 6 | 15 | 21 | 28.6% | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Michele Gurdal | Ching Ling Chang | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1970 | 1476 | 94.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | 41.7% | -0.67 | 1–1 | — | — | +1.60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 1491 | 100.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.00 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1972 | 1465 | 98.0 | — | — | — | — | +97 | +73 | -5 | 34.1% | -1.43 | 3–1 (75%) | 0–2 | — | +2.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1973 | 1551 | 123.8 | — | — | — | — | +12 | +55 | -111 | 40.8% | -0.65 | 4–7 (36%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | +1.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1974 | 1599 | 128.2 | — | — | — | — | — | -3 | -66 | 48.2% | +0.18 | 0–5 (0%) | 1–3 (25%) | 92.5 | +1.57 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1975 | 1590 | 130.3 | — | — | — | — | -58 | +7 | +40 | 48.5% | -0.08 | 2–11 (15%) | 3–3 (50%) | 90.9 | +0.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1976 | 1675 | 122.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +10 | -55 | 47.5% | -0.69 | 4–3 (57%) | 5–0 (100%) | 106.9 | -1.11 | 1971 | 1468 | 98.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +43 | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.06 |
| 24 | 1977 | 1576 | 111.9 | — | — | — | — | — | +75 | -40 | 33.3% | -1.24 | 0–5 (0%) | 1–0 | — | +0.31 | 1972 | 1442 | 90.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.27 |
| 25 | 1978 | 1551 | 118.7 | — | — | — | — | -88 | +37 | +3 | 36.7% | -0.71 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–3 (25%) | 97.1 | +0.56 | 1973 | 1445 | 99.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +24 | +44 | 34.3% | -1.09 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | +1.08 |
| 26 | 1979 | 1536 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +30 | 44.0% | -0.76 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | +1.54 | 1974 | 1467 | 93.7 | — | — | — | — | +96 | -3 | — | 35.8% | -1.49 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–0 (100%) | 102.1 | +0.93 |
| 27 | 1980 | 1516 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +5 | +35 | 40.0% | -0.85 | 0–2 | 0–2 | — | +0.29 | 1975 | 1412 | 92.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7.7% | -3.31 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.28 |
| 28 | 1981 | 1511 | 103.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -3.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1715 | 122.8 | — | — | — | — | -4 | +24 | -20 | 43.0% | -0.55 | 18–39 (32%) | 15–14 (52%) | 92.2 | +4.17 | — | 1500 | 93.3 | — | — | — | — | +96 | +8 | +44 | 28.3% | -1.86 | 3–6 (33%) | 5–1 (83%) | 101.2 | +4.81 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Ching Ling Chang
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kate Latham | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 8, 1975 | H2H |
| Patricia Bostrom | 0 | 2 | 2 | Mar 13, 1975 | H2H |
| Patricia Reese | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 12, 1974 | H2H |
| Gwynn Sammel | 2 | 0 | 2 | Apr 18, 1974 | H2H |
| Raquel Giscafre | 0 | 1 | 1 | Oct 15, 1975 | H2H |