H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Michele Gurdal vs Eva Szabo H2H: 1-1
Michele Gurdal and Eva Szabo are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Michele Gurdal won the 1976 Nice fourth round 5-7 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 1976* | Nice | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Michele Gurdal | 5-7 7-6 6-3 | Eva Szabo | Match data |
| Apr 13, 1974* | Monte Carlo | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Eva Szabo | 2-6 6-0 6-4 | Michele Gurdal | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michele Gurdal | — | — | — | 1,714 | 90 | 135 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Eva Szabo | — | — | — | 1,675 | 43 | 52 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michele Gurdal | Eva Szabo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1970 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1972 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1973 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1974 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1975 | 18–24 | 42.9% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1976 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 3 | 1969 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1977 | 3–11 | 21.4% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1978 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1979 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1980 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 9–7 | 56.2% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 8–7 | 53.3% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |