H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Michele Gurdal vs Jo Durie H2H: 1-0

Michele Gurdal holds a 1–0 lead over Jo Durie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michele Gurdal leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Michele Gurdal won the 1978 Monte Carlo round of 32 6-4 6-0.

BEL Age 73 Left-Handed
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
GBR Age 66 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michele Gurdal 6-4 6-0 Jo Durie Match data Apr 8, 1978* R32 Monte Carlo WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Michele Gurdal — — — 1,715 90 135 40.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Jo Durie — #5 31 2,102 311 263 54.2% 0 0 0 1 8 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michele Gurdal Jo Durie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,602 0 0
17 1970 2–3 40.0% — 1,475 0 0 1978 15–9 62.5% — 1,618 0 1
18 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,490 0 0 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3
19 1972 7–13 35.0% — 1,464 0 1 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,736 0 4
20 1973 11–19 36.7% — 1,551 0 1 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,860 0 7
21 1974 19–22 46.3% — 1,598 0 1 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,842 0 7
22 1975 18–24 42.9% — 1,589 0 1 1983 47–18 72.3% #6 2,095 0 9
23 1976 13–14 48.1% — 1,675 0 3 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,891 0 9
24 1977 3–11 21.4% — 1,571 0 3 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,800 0 9
25 1978 8–15 34.8% — 1,548 0 3 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,842 0 9
26 1979 5–6 45.5% — 1,534 0 3 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,742 0 9
27 1980 3–6 33.3% — 1,515 0 3 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,703 0 9
28 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,510 0 3 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9
29 — — — — — — — 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,673 0 9
30 — — — — — — — 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,708 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,688 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,563 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,555 0 9
34 — — — — — — — 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,548 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Michele Gurdal Jo Durie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
17 1970 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1978 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
18 1971 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1979 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1980 — — — — 13 6 19 68.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0%
20 1973 3 5 8 37.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
21 1974 — — — — 12 12 24 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9%
22 1975 0 3 3 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 12 3 15 80.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
23 1976 — — — — 11 10 21 52.4% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 1977 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 6 13 53.8%
26 1979 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
27 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1988 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 3 7 10 30.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 4 11 15 26.7% 48 61 109 44.0% 28 46 74 37.8% 2 9 11 18.2% — 73 75 148 49.3% 57 45 102 55.9% 103 72 175 58.9% 50 65 115 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Michele Gurdal Jo Durie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1499 100.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.54
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1503 107.8 — — — — +73 — +95 54.2% +0.71 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +3.20
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1602 121.7 — — — — — -35 +42 56.1% +0.71 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — +2.17
17 1970 1476 94.7 — — — — — +10 — 41.7% -0.67 1–1 — — +1.60 1978 1619 121.0 — — — — +14 — -9 57.4% +0.50 5–1 (83%) 1–2 (33%) 104.3 +3.05
18 1971 1491 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.19 1979 1713 129.5 — — — — — -74 -93 58.5% +0.36 6–1 (86%) 6–2 (75%) 110.0 +0.65
19 1972 1465 98.0 — — — — +97 +73 -5 34.1% -1.43 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — +2.28 1980 1736 123.2 — — — — -179 -11 -58 61.7% +0.60 5–8 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 99.6 +0.27
20 1973 1551 123.8 — — — — +12 +55 -111 40.8% -0.65 4–7 (36%) 3–1 (75%) — +1.69 1981 1861 136.4 — — — — -158 -78 -117 60.8% +0.60 12–2 (86%) 4–1 (80%) 113.5 -1.05
21 1974 1599 128.2 — — — — — -3 -66 48.2% +0.18 0–5 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 92.5 +1.17 1982 1843 141.3 — — — — -59 -76 -39 55.1% +0.21 8–9 (47%) 2–4 (33%) 97.4 -1.90
22 1975 1590 130.3 — — — — -58 +7 +40 48.5% -0.08 2–11 (15%) 3–3 (50%) 90.9 +0.08 1983 2096 160.0 — — — — -76 -185 -100 69.3% +1.31 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 104.6 -5.50
23 1976 1676 122.7 — — — — — +9 -56 47.5% -0.69 4–3 (57%) 5–0 (100%) 106.9 -1.46 1984 1892 136.4 — — — — +10 -61 +83 49.3% +0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–5 (17%) 95.2 +0.35
24 1977 1572 111.8 — — — — — +79 -35 33.3% -1.24 0–5 (0%) 1–0 — +0.31 1985 1801 133.4 — — — — +15 -49 +121 48.8% +0.06 7–7 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 96.7 -1.39
25 1978 1548 118.6 — — — — -89 +40 +6 36.7% -0.71 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.1 +0.35 1986 1843 140.1 — — — — +2 -80 +45 55.7% +0.21 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 105.1 -2.77
26 1979 1534 99.7 — — — — — — +32 44.0% -0.76 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +1.51 1987 1742 134.3 — — — — +30 -31 +107 41.0% -0.69 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 96.4 -2.49
27 1980 1516 97.6 — — — — — +5 +35 40.0% -0.85 0–2 0–2 — +0.40 1988 1703 127.8 — — — — 0 -16 +121 49.4% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 8–4 (67%) 101.9 -0.25
28 1981 1510 103.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.11 1989 1622 126.1 — — — — -7 — +202 41.3% -0.67 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +0.33
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1674 130.7 — — — — -60 — +193 51.7% +0.48 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +0.04
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1709 132.3 — — — — +5 -111 +95 45.5% -0.12 6–7 (46%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 +1.02
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1689 130.8 — — — — -48 -50 +163 50.0% -0.09 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 99.1 +0.39
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1564 107.8 — — — — -12 — — 35.9% -0.74 3–6 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 92.1 +1.33
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1555 106.0 — — — — — — +191 33.3% -1.42 0–2 — — -0.60
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1549 107.6 — — — — — — +141 40.0% -0.60 0–2 1–0 — -0.20
Career — 1715 122.8 — — — — -4 +24 -20 43.0% -0.55 18–39 (32%) 15–14 (52%) 92.2 +3.58 — 2102 141.8 — — — — -26 -68 +43 53.6% +0.27 97–90 (52%) 53–46 (54%) 102.6 -0.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.