H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Michele Gurdal vs Mimi Wikstedt H2H: 1-1
Michele Gurdal and Mimi Wikstedt are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Michele Gurdal leads 1–0 on clay, while Mimi Wikstedt leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mimi Wikstedt won the 1978 Christchurch third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 1978* | Christchurch | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Mimi Wikstedt | 6-2 6-4 | Michele Gurdal | Match data |
| Feb 28, 1974* | Winter Haven | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Michele Gurdal | 6-1 6-1 | Mimi Wikstedt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michele Gurdal | — | — | — | 1,714 | 90 | 135 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Mimi Wikstedt | — | — | — | 1,600 | 52 | 97 | 34.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michele Gurdal | Mimi Wikstedt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1970 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1972 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 7–11 | 38.9% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1973 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 13–18 | 41.9% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1974 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1975 | 18–24 | 42.9% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1976 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1977 | 3–11 | 21.4% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1978 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1979 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1980 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,420 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |