H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Michele Gurdal vs Renata Tomanova H2H: 1-3
Renata Tomanova holds a 3–1 lead over Michele Gurdal in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Renata Tomanova leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Renata Tomanova won the 1976 New South Wales fourth round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 73
Left-Handed
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
Age 71
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 1976* | New South Wales | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Renata Tomanova | 6-3 7-5 | Michele Gurdal | Match data |
| May 28, 1975* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Renata Tomanova | 7-6 6-2 | Michele Gurdal | Match data |
| Mar 16, 1974* | Ocala | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Renata Tomanova | 6-4 7-6 | Michele Gurdal | Match data |
| Oct 20, 1973* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Michele Gurdal | 6-3 7-6 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michele Gurdal | — | — | — | 1,714 | 90 | 135 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Renata Tomanova | — | — | — | 1,940 | 225 | 214 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michele Gurdal | Renata Tomanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1970 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1972 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1973 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 1974 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1975 | 18–24 | 42.9% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 28–26 | 51.9% | — | 1,854 | 0 | 9 |
| 23 | 1976 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 28–25 | 52.8% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1977 | 3–11 | 21.4% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1978 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1979 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1980 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 9 |