H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Michele Gurdal vs Sue Barker H2H: 0-4
Sue Barker holds a 4–0 lead over Michele Gurdal in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Sue Barker leads 3–0 on grass and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sue Barker won the 1978 Australian Open fourth round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 73
Left-Handed
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 70
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 25, 1978 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Sue Barker | 6-2 7-5 | Michele Gurdal | Match data |
| May 13, 1976* | Bournemouth | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Sue Barker | 6-2 6-3 | Michele Gurdal | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1975* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Sue Barker | 6-1 6-4 | Michele Gurdal | Match data |
| Jan 11, 1975* | Auckland Nz Open | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Sue Barker | 6-2 6-1 | Michele Gurdal | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michele Gurdal | — | — | — | 1,714 | 90 | 135 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Sue Barker | #162 | #57 | — | 2,257 | 381 | 217 | 63.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michele Gurdal | Sue Barker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1970 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 40–20 | 66.7% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 1972 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 50–19 | 72.5% | — | 1,967 | 0 | 11 |
| 20 | 1973 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 64–23 | 73.6% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 14 |
| 21 | 1974 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 51–18 | 73.9% | — | 2,107 | 1 | 16 |
| 22 | 1975 | 18–24 | 42.9% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 17 |
| 23 | 1976 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 2,017 | 1 | 20 |
| 24 | 1977 | 3–11 | 21.4% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,931 | 1 | 20 |
| 25 | 1978 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,959 | 1 | 21 |
| 26 | 1979 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,803 | 1 | 21 |
| 27 | 1980 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,750 | 1 | 22 |
| 28 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #57 | 1,556 | 1 | 22 |