H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Michele Gurdal vs Terry Holladay H2H: 2-0
Michele Gurdal holds a 2–0 lead over Terry Holladay in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Michele Gurdal leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Michele Gurdal won the 1976 Toronto third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 73
Left-Handed
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 70
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 1976 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Michele Gurdal | 6-3 6-3 | Terry Holladay | Match data |
| Mar 16, 1974* | Ocala | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Michele Gurdal | 6-2 6-2 | Terry Holladay | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michele Gurdal | — | — | — | 1,714 | 90 | 135 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Terry Holladay | #395 | #39 | 7 | 1,935 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michele Gurdal | Terry Holladay | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1970 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1972 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1973 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,876 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1974 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,932 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1975 | 18–24 | 42.9% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1976 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1977 | 3–11 | 21.4% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1978 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1979 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1980 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #50 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #103 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,500 | 0 | 1 |