H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Michelle Jaggard Lai vs Bettina Fulco H2H: 1-2
Bettina Fulco holds a 2–1 lead over Michelle Jaggard Lai in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Bettina Fulco leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Bettina Fulco won the 1993 Key Biscayne first round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 57
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 57
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 1993* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Bettina Fulco | 6-4 6-4 | Michelle Jaggard Lai | Match data |
| Sep 14, 1989* | Athens | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Bettina Fulco | 4-6 7-5 7-5 | Michelle Jaggard Lai | Match data |
| Oct 14, 1988* | San Juan | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Michelle Jaggard Lai | 7-6 6-2 | Bettina Fulco | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelle Jaggard Lai | — | — | — | 1,639 | 61 | 105 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bettina Fulco | #770 | #23 | 197 | 1,873 | 139 | 152 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michelle Jaggard Lai | Bettina Fulco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1985 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #116 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #40 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #24 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #47 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #131 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #83 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #290 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #142 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #133 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |