H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Michelle Jaggard Lai vs Emmanuelle Derly H2H: 0-2
Emmanuelle Derly holds a 2–0 lead over Michelle Jaggard Lai in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Emmanuelle Derly leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emmanuelle Derly won the 1988 Auckland second round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 1988* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Emmanuelle Derly | 7-5 6-4 | Michelle Jaggard Lai | Match data |
| Apr 23, 1987* | Taipei | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Emmanuelle Derly | 6-4 6-4 | Michelle Jaggard Lai | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelle Jaggard Lai | — | — | — | 1,639 | 61 | 105 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Emmanuelle Derly | — | — | — | 1,560 | 15 | 29 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michelle Jaggard Lai | Emmanuelle Derly | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1985 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1991 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1993 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1994 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |