H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Michelle Jaggard Lai vs Federica Bonsignori H2H: 1-0
Michelle Jaggard Lai holds a 1–0 lead over Federica Bonsignori in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michelle Jaggard Lai leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michelle Jaggard Lai won the 1989 Australian Open second round 6-4 3-6 10-8.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 57
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 58
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 1989* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Michelle Jaggard Lai | 6-4 3-6 10-8 | Federica Bonsignori | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelle Jaggard Lai | — | — | — | 1,639 | 61 | 105 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Federica Bonsignori | #813 | #28 | 30 | 1,709 | 75 | 112 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michelle Jaggard Lai | Federica Bonsignori | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1985 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #144 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #142 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #122 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #90 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #143 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #77 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #50 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #64 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #114 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #211 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |