H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Michelle Jaggard Lai vs Leigh Anne Eldredge H2H: 2-1
Michelle Jaggard Lai holds a 2–1 lead over Leigh Anne Eldredge in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Michelle Jaggard Lai leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Michelle Jaggard Lai won the 1989 Schenectady second round 6-3 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 1989* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Michelle Jaggard Lai | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Leigh Anne Eldredge | Match data |
| Feb 10, 1989* | Wellington | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Leigh Anne Eldredge | 5-7 7-5 6-1 | Michelle Jaggard Lai | Match data |
| Oct 13, 1988* | San Juan | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Michelle Jaggard Lai | 6-1 2-6 6-4 | Leigh Anne Eldredge | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelle Jaggard Lai | — | — | — | 1,639 | 61 | 105 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Leigh Anne Eldredge | — | — | — | 1,539 | 8 | 20 | 28.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michelle Jaggard Lai | Leigh Anne Eldredge | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1985 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |