H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Michelle Jaggard Lai vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 0-2
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer holds a 2–0 lead over Michelle Jaggard Lai in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1994 Tokyo Japan Open third round 4-6 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 1994* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | Michelle Jaggard Lai | Match data |
| Sep 18, 1993* | Hong Kong | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-2 6-2 | Michelle Jaggard Lai | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelle Jaggard Lai | — | — | — | 1,639 | 61 | 105 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Michelle Jaggard Lai | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1985 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |