H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Michelle Jaggard Lai vs Patty Fendick H2H: 1-0

Michelle Jaggard Lai holds a 1–0 lead over Patty Fendick in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michelle Jaggard Lai leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Michelle Jaggard Lai won the 1992 Birmingham round of 64 6-4 5-7 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michelle Jaggard Lai
AUS Age 57 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Patty Fendick
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michelle Jaggard Lai 6-4 5-7 6-2 Patty Fendick #70 Match data Jun 10, 1992* R64 Birmingham Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Michelle Jaggard Lai — — — 1,639 61 105 36.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Patty Fendick #360 #19 55 1,883 199 162 55.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michelle Jaggard Lai Patty Fendick
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,459 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,442 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
18 1987 8–10 44.4% — 1,510 0 0 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,430 0 0
19 1988 9–16 36.0% — 1,515 0 0 1984 2–1 66.7% #120 1,470 0 0
20 1989 9–16 36.0% — 1,499 0 0 1985 6–8 42.9% #83 1,550 0 0
21 1990 6–12 33.3% — 1,505 0 0 1986 8–6 57.1% #95 1,643 0 0
22 1991 3–6 33.3% — 1,524 0 0 1987 8–9 47.1% #79 1,674 0 0
23 1992 3–4 42.9% — 1,555 0 0 1988 38–16 70.4% #22 1,798 0 2
24 1993 14–19 42.4% — 1,576 0 0 1989 22–13 62.9% #31 1,762 0 3
25 1994 9–16 36.0% — 1,559 0 0 1990 16–15 51.6% #42 1,739 0 3
26 — — — — — — — 1991 16–18 47.1% #56 1,689 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 1992 17–17 50.0% #43 1,778 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 1993 29–17 63.0% #27 1,839 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 1994 23–20 53.5% #50 1,724 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 1995 13–13 50.0% #57 1,690 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Michelle Jaggard Lai Patty Fendick
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1985 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1987 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1988 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1984 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1990 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
22 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1992 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1988 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0%
24 1993 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1989 19 8 27 70.4% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1994 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 9 13 22 40.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 4 9 55.6%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 17 11 28 60.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 49 60 109 45.0% 2 15 17 11.8% 9 21 30 30.0% 1 8 9 11.1% — 129 93 222 58.1% 10 14 24 41.7% 39 31 70 55.7% 21 24 45 46.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Michelle Jaggard Lai Patty Fendick
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1985 1459 99.1 — — — — — — — 11.1% -2.89 0–1 1–0 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1986 1442 96.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 1–1 — +0.04 1982 1500 107.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.32
18 1987 1511 110.2 — — — — +92 — +3 43.6% -0.13 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 96.5 +1.25 1983 1430 95.2 — — — — +124 +81 — 27.3% -1.46 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +0.97
19 1988 1515 101.4 — — — — +48 — -67 36.4% -0.91 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — +1.65 1984 1471 109.1 — — — — +101 — — 71.4% +0.86 0–1 — — +0.32
20 1989 1499 106.6 — — — — +14 -24 -14 37.9% -0.86 4–4 (50%) 1–0 — +2.26 1985 1551 125.3 — — — — +52 — +31 47.1% -0.09 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.32
21 1990 1505 109.2 — — — — +20 -35 — 27.8% -1.64 2–0 — — -0.23 1986 1643 127.4 — — — — -7 — -4 58.6% +1.00 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.36
22 1991 1525 117.5 — — — — -2 — — 36.8% -1.00 0–1 2–0 — -0.56 1987 1674 134.5 — — — — -15 — -12 47.5% +0.10 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — -0.36
23 1992 1555 114.2 — — — — -33 — -14 37.5% -1.06 2–0 — — -0.27 1988 1798 142.2 — — — — +11 — -57 68.9% +1.29 9–6 (60%) 8–7 (53%) 101.4 +4.37
24 1993 1577 130.3 — — — — +19 — -2 42.3% -0.40 7–5 (58%) 6–4 (60%) 105.2 -0.76 1989 1763 138.6 — — — — +28 — -46 62.3% +0.83 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 95.6 +2.33
25 1994 1559 117.1 — — — — +19 — — 40.4% -0.60 2–5 (29%) 3–2 (60%) 98.9 -0.39 1990 1740 136.0 — — — — +3 — +11 54.8% +0.16 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.1 +0.10
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1690 123.1 — — — — -46 -91 +29 47.3% -0.30 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 98.7 +0.64
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1779 141.8 — — — — -32 -186 +25 51.9% +0.05 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.9 -0.86
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1839 147.9 — — — — -9 — +30 62.1% +0.58 5–6 (45%) 8–0 (100%) 104.7 -0.37
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1725 142.2 — — — — +38 — +70 55.9% +0.41 5–11 (31%) 6–4 (60%) 95.7 +0.50
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1691 135.9 — — — — +70 -105 +56 51.7% +0.02 2–4 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.2 -0.51
Career — 1639 117.7 — — — — +28 -30 -22 37.6% -0.82 22–22 (50%) 17–11 (61%) 107.4 +1.72 — 1883 144.8 — — — — +11 -97 +4 56.2% +0.38 45–57 (44%) 39–27 (59%) 101.0 +2.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.