H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Michelle Jaggard Lai vs Stacey Martin H2H: 1-0

Michelle Jaggard Lai holds a 1–0 lead over Stacey Martin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michelle Jaggard Lai leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Michelle Jaggard Lai won the 1991 Birmingham round of 64 6-4 7-6.

AUS Age 57 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michelle Jaggard Lai 6-4 7-6 Stacey Martin Match data Jun 12, 1991* R64 Birmingham Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Michelle Jaggard Lai 1,639 61 105 36.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stacey Martin 1,677 37 59 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michelle Jaggard Lai Stacey Martin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1985 0–4 0.0% 1,459 0 0 1987 0–1 0.0% 1,491 0 0
17 1986 0–2 0.0% 1,442 0 0 1988 6–6 50.0% 1,560 0 0
18 1987 8–10 44.4% 1,510 0 0 1989 10–13 43.5% 1,613 0 0
19 1988 9–16 36.0% 1,515 0 0 1990 11–18 37.9% 1,575 0 0
20 1989 9–16 36.0% 1,499 0 0 1991 8–15 34.8% 1,552 0 0
21 1990 6–12 33.3% 1,505 0 0 1992 2–5 28.6% 1,528 0 0
22 1991 3–6 33.3% 1,524 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% 1,515 0 0
23 1992 3–4 42.9% 1,555 0 0
24 1993 14–19 42.4% 1,576 0 0
25 1994 9–16 36.0% 1,559 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Michelle Jaggard Lai Stacey Martin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1987 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1987 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 8 9 17 47.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1988 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1990 5 10 15 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1990 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1992 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 1993 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 1994 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 49 60 109 45.0% 2 15 17 11.8% 9 21 30 30.0% 1 8 9 11.1% 25 36 61 41.0% 10 17 27 37.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Michelle Jaggard Lai Stacey Martin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1985 1459 99.1 11.1% -2.89 0–1 1–0 -0.14 1987 1491 97.9 0.0% -4.00 +0.06
17 1986 1442 96.6 20.0% -2.60 0–1 1–1 +0.04 1988 1561 115.3 +34 48.0% -0.28 1–0 0–1 +0.49
18 1987 1511 110.2 +92 +3 43.6% -0.13 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 96.5 +1.25 1989 1613 127.6 +14 -79 45.5% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 1–1 -0.27
19 1988 1515 101.4 +48 -67 36.4% -0.91 3–2 (60%) 2–0 +1.65 1990 1575 118.2 -3 -19 42.6% -0.47 5–7 (42%) 2–3 (40%) 97.9 +0.10
20 1989 1499 106.6 +14 -24 -14 37.9% -0.86 4–4 (50%) 1–0 +2.26 1991 1552 114.5 -11 +2 38.3% -0.83 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 95.7 +0.49
21 1990 1505 109.2 +20 -35 27.8% -1.64 2–0 -0.23 1992 1528 91.6 -2 +13 21.4% -2.36 1–1 +0.30
22 1991 1525 117.5 -2 36.8% -1.00 0–1 2–0 -0.56 1993 1516 98.7 33.3% -2.67 0–1 -0.04
23 1992 1555 114.2 -33 -14 37.5% -1.06 2–0 -0.27
24 1993 1577 130.3 +19 -2 42.3% -0.40 7–5 (58%) 6–4 (60%) 105.2 -0.76
25 1994 1559 117.1 +19 40.4% -0.60 2–5 (29%) 3–2 (60%) 98.9 -0.39
Career 1639 117.7 +28 -30 -22 37.6% -0.82 22–22 (50%) 17–11 (61%) 107.4 +1.72 1678 119.8 +6 -21 41.1% -0.68 12–16 (43%) 3–9 (25%) 94.6 +1.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.